Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;66(3):341-53.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr027. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

Partner caregiving in older cohabiting couples

Affiliations

Partner caregiving in older cohabiting couples

Claire M Noël-Miller. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the rapidly increasing prevalence of cohabitation among older adults, the caregiving literature has exclusively focused on formally married individuals. Extending prior work on intra-couple care, this study contrasts frail cohabitors' patterns of care receipt from a partner to that of frail spouses.

Methods: Using nationally representative panel data from the Health and Retirement Study (2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006), we estimate random effects cross-sectional times series models predicting frail cohabitors' likelihood of receiving partner care compared with their married counterparts'. Conditional on the receipt of intra-couple care, we also examine differences in marital and nonmarital partners' caregiving hours and caregiving involvement relative to other helpers.

Results: Net of sociodemographic, disability, and comorbidity factors, we find that cohabitors are less likely to receive partner care than married individuals. However, caregiving nonmarital partners provide as many hours of care as spouses while providing a substantially larger share of disabled respondents' care than marital partners.

Discussion: Cohabitation and marriage have distinct implications for older adults' patterns of partner care receipt. This study adds weight to a growing body of research emphasizing the importance of accounting for older adults' nontraditional union forms and of examining the ramifications of cohabitation for older adults' well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams JM, Jones WH. The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:1177–1196.
    1. Allen SM. Gender differences in spousal caregiving and unmet need for care. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 1994;49:187–195.
    1. Allen SM, Goldscheider F, Ciambrone DA. Gender roles, marital intimacy, and nomination of spouse as primary caregiver. The Gerontologist. 1999;39:150–158. - PubMed
    1. Allison PD. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
    1. Amemiya T. Tobit models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics. 1984;24:3–61.

Publication types