Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;61(3):148-51.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr008. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

Regional trends in awards of incapacity benefit by cause

A Cattrell  1 , E C Harris, K T Palmer, M Kim, M Aylward, D Coggon
Affiliations

Regional trends in awards of incapacity benefit by cause

A Cattrell et al. Occup Med (Lond). 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: Since the early 1990s, rates of incapacity benefit (IB) in Britain for musculoskeletal complaints have declined, and they have been overtaken by mental and behavioural disorders as the main reason for award of IB.

Aims: To explore reasons for this change.

Methods: Using data supplied by the Department for Work and Pensions, we analysed trends in the ratio of new IB awards for mental and behavioural disorders to those for musculoskeletal disorders during 1997-2007 by Government region.

Results: In Great Britain overall, the above ratio more than doubled over the study period, as a consequence of falling numbers of new awards for musculoskeletal disorders. The extent to which the ratio increased was smallest in London (50%) and South-East England (56%), and was progressively larger in more northerly regions (>150% in North-East England and Scotland).

Conclusions: The differences in trends between regions seem too large to be explained by differential changes in working conditions, patterns of employment or the rigour with which claims were assessed. An alternative explanation could be that the main driver for the trends has been culturally determined changes in health beliefs and expectations, and that these cultural changes began in London and the South-East, only later spreading to other parts of Britain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ratio of new awards of Incapacity Benefit for mental and behavioural disorders to those for musculoskeletal disorders by year, Great Britain, 1997-2007
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in relative frequency of new awards of Incapacity Benefit for mental and behavioural disorders and musculoskeletal disorders between 1997 and 2007 by region a For definition of index, see text
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group . Epidemiology Review: the epidemiology and cost of back pain. HMSO; London: 1994.
    1. Brown J, Hanlon P, Turok I, Webster D, Arnott J, Macdonald EB. Mental health as a reason for claiming incapacity benefit – a comparison of national and local trends. J Pub Health. 2009;31:74–80. - PubMed
    1. Health and Safety Executive Labour Force Survey. [17 February 2011, date last accessed]. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/lfs/0708/strgor3.htm.
    1. Lötters F, Burdorf A, Kuiper J, Miedema H. Model for the work-relatedness of low back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003;29:431–40. - PubMed
    1. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52:157–68. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms