Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 1;286(26):22905-12.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.199984. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

Interstrand dipole-dipole interactions can stabilize the collagen triple helix

Affiliations

Interstrand dipole-dipole interactions can stabilize the collagen triple helix

Matthew D Shoulders et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

The amino acid sequence of collagen is composed of GlyXaaYaa repeats. A prevailing paradigm maintains that stable collagen triple helices form when (2S)-proline (Pro) or Pro derivatives that prefer the C(γ)-endo ring pucker are in the Xaa position and Pro derivatives that prefer the C(γ)-exo ring pucker are in the Yaa position. Anomalously, an amino acid sequence in an invertebrate collagen has (2S,4R)-4-hydroxyproline (Hyp), a C(γ)-exo-puckered Pro derivative, in the Xaa position. In certain contexts, triple helices with Hyp in the Xaa position are now known to be hyperstable. Most intriguingly, the sequence (GlyHypHyp)(n) forms a more stable triple helix than does the sequence (GlyProHyp)(n). Competing theories exist for the physicochemical basis of the hyperstability of (GlyHypHyp)(n) triple helices. By synthesizing and analyzing triple helices with different C(γ)-exo-puckered proline derivatives in the Xaa and Yaa positions, we conclude that interstrand dipole-dipole interactions are the primary determinant of their additional stability. These findings provide a new framework for understanding collagen stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Preferred ring conformations of Pro and Pro derivatives. The Cγ-exo conformation is favored strongly by the gauche effect when R1 = OH (Hyp) or F (Flp), R2 = H, and by steric effects when R1 = H, R2 = CH3 (Mep). The Cγ-endo:Cγ-exo ratio is ∼2 when R1 = R2 = H (Pro) (13).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Conformational analysis of peptides. A–C, circular dichroism spectra of peptide solutions (∼0.2 mm in 50 mm sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0; except (GlyFlpFlp)7, which was ∼0.01 mm) at 4 °C after incubating at 4 °C for ≥24 h. D–F, effect of temperature on the molar ellipticity at 225 nm. Data were recorded at 3-°C intervals after a 5-min equilibration.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Sedimentation equilibrium analysis of peptides. Circles, 4 °C; squares, 37 or 40 °C. For clarity, only every third data point is shown. Best fits are shown as solid or dashed lines. A, (HypMepGly)7 (40,000 rpm at 4 °C and 50,000 rpm at 37 °C). Fits shown are for monomer at both 4 and 37 °C. B, (GlyFlpHyp)7 (45,000 rpm at 4 °C and 42,000 rpm at 40 °C) and (GlyHypHyp)7 (40,000 rpm at 4 °C and 50,000 rpm at 37 °C). Fits shown are for trimer at 4 °C and monomer at 37 or 40 °C. C, (GlyHypFlp)7 (45,000 rpm at 4 °C and 42,000 rpm at 40 °C) and (GlyProFlp)7 (45,000 rpm at 4 °C and 42,000 rpm at 40 °C). Fits shown are for trimer at 4 °C, and a mixture of monomer and trimer at 40 °C.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Differential scanning calorimetry of peptides. A, (HypMepGly)7 (289 μm). B, (GlyHypHyp)7 (478 μm), (GlyFlpHyp)7 (138 μm), and (GlyProHyp)7 (176 μm). C, (GlyProFlp)7 (130 μm) and (GlyHypFlp)7 (136 μm). Data were collected with a scan rate of 6 °C/h.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Illustration of dipoles in the side chains of proximal Xaa and Yaa residues in a (GlyXaaYaa)n triple helix. Images were created by modifying Hyp residues in panel A, which shows a cross section of a (HypHypGly)10 triple helix (32), with the program PyMOL (Delano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA). The dipole-dipole interaction in panel A could contribute 0.6 kcal/mol to the stability of the triple helix (37), and likely more in panel B.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shoulders M. D., Raines R. T. (2009) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 929–958 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brodsky B., Thiagarajan G., Madhan B., Kar K. (2008) Biopolymers. 89, 345–353 - PubMed
    1. Fields G. B. (2010) Org. Biomol. Chem. 8, 1237–1258 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramshaw J. A., Shah N. K., Brodsky B. (1998) J. Struct. Biol. 122, 86–91 - PubMed
    1. Holmgren S. K., Bretscher L. E., Taylor K. M., Raines R. T. (1999) Chem. Biol. 6, 63–70 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources