Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 3:5.
doi: 10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5230.

Misidentification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in Tripoli, Libya

Affiliations

Misidentification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in Tripoli, Libya

Mohamed O Ahmed et al. Libyan J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a nosocomial (hospital-acquired) pathogen of exceptional concern. It is responsible for life-threatening infections in both the hospital and the community.

Aims: To determine the frequency of MRSA misidentification in hospitals in Tripoli, Libya using current testing methods.

Methods: One hundred and seventy S. aureus isolates previously identified as MRSA were obtained from three hospitals in Tripoli. All isolates were reidentified by culturing on mannitol salt agar, API 20 Staph System and retested for resistance to methicillin using the cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility test and PBP2a. D-tests and vancomycin E-tests (Van-E-tests) were also performed for vancomycin-resistant isolates.

Results: Of the 170 isolates examined, 86 (51%) were confirmed as MRSA (i.e. 49% were misidentified as MRSA). Fifteen (17%) of the confirmed MRSA strains exhibited inducible clindamycin resistance. Of the 86 confirmed MRSA isolates, 13 (15%) were resistant to mupirocin, 53 (62%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 41 (48%) were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and none were resistant to linezolid. Although disc-diffusion testing indicated that 23 (27%) of the isolates were resistant to vancomycin, none of the isolates were vancomycin-resistant by Van-E-test.

Conclusions: Misidentification of nosocomial S. aureus as MRSA is a serious problem in Libyan hospitals. There is an urgent need for the proper training of microbiology laboratory technicians in standard antimicrobial susceptibility procedures and the implementation of quality control programs in microbiology laboratories of Libyan hospitals.

Keywords: E-test; MRSA misidentification; clindamycin resistance; vancomycin resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jorgensen JH. Laboratory and epidemiologic experience with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the USA. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986;5:693–6. - PubMed
    1. Palavecino E. Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory aspects of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) infections. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;391:1–19. - PubMed
    1. Martins A, Cunha Mde L. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci: epidemiological and molecular aspects. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51:787–95. - PubMed
    1. Schmitz FJ, Petridou J, Fluit AC, Hadding U, Peters G, von Eiff C. Distribution of macrolide-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus blood-culture isolates from fifteen German university hospitals. M.A.R.S. Study group. Multicentre study on antibiotic resistance in staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:385–7. - PubMed
    1. Lewis JS, Jorgensen JH. Inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned? Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:280–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources