Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;5(2):671-6.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-010-9243-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

De novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir versus entecavir monotherapy for the treatment of naïve HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

Affiliations

De novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir versus entecavir monotherapy for the treatment of naïve HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

Li-Chun Wang et al. Hepatol Int. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Either combination treatment or monotherapy using agents with a high genetic barrier are recommended for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The aim of this study was to compare effect of naïve HBeAg-negative CHB patients with either de novo combination of lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) or entecavir (ETV) monotherapy.

Methods: HBeAg-negative CHB patients (n = 71) with ALT levels between 2 and 10 times the upper normal limit and HBV DNA levels >10(4) copies/mL were enrolled. Patients were treated with either LAM 100 mg plus ADV 10 mg per day (n = 31) or ETV 0.5 mg per day (n = 40) for 48 weeks.

Results: The average reduction in HBV DNA level compared with baseline were 5.16 ± 1.69 log in the LAM + ADV group and 5.36 ± 1.70 log in the ETV group by week 48 (P = 0.624). The virological response (VR) rates were 80.65 and 77.5%, the biochemical response (BR) rates were 93.55 and 90.00% at week 48 in the LAM + ADV and ETV groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the VR and BR between the two groups. During the 48-week treatment period, virological breakthrough and serious side effects were not noted in any patient.

Conclusions: Both LAM + ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy are effective in naïve HBeAg-negative CHB patients, but further studies are needed to obtain long-term results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Serum HBV DNA levels in naïve HBeAg-negative CHB patients treated with LAM + ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response rates of naïve HBeAg-negative CHB patients treated with LAM + ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy: a virological response, b biochemical response

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feld JJ, Wong DK, Heathcote EJ. Endpoints of therapy in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2009;49:S96–S102. doi: 10.1002/hep.22977. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hui CK, Lau GK. Treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007;10:474–482. doi: 10.1007/s11938-007-0047-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shouval D, Lai CL, Chang TT, et al. Relapse of hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued successful entecavir treatment: the case for continuous antiviral therapy. J Hepatol. 2009;50:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayoub WS, Keeffe EB. Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:167–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03731.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Degertekin B, Lok AS. Update on viral hepatitis: 2008. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009;25:180–185. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328324f478. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources