Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition
- PMID: 2148581
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.6.1084
Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition
Abstract
Four experiments investigate printed word frequency and subjective rated familiarity. Words of varied printed frequency and subjective familiarity were presented. A reaction time advantage for high-familiarity and high-frequency words was found in visual (Experiment 1) and auditory (Experiment 2) lexical decision. In Experiments 3 and 4, a cued naming task elicited a naming response after a specified delay after presentation. In Experiment 3, naming of visual words showed a frequency effect with no naming delay. The frequency effect diminished at longer delay intervals. Naming times for auditorily presented words (Experiment 4) showed no frequency effect at any delay. Both naming experiments showed familiarity effects. The relevance of these results are discussed in terms of the role of printed frequency for theories of lexical access, task- and modality-specific effects, and the nature of subjective familiarity.
Similar articles
-
Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1312-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03193274. Mem Cognit. 2006. PMID: 17225511
-
Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):460-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.460. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992. PMID: 1593230
-
Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):514-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.514. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001. PMID: 11294447
-
Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1270-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03201199. Mem Cognit. 1998. PMID: 9847550
-
How the bimodal format of presentation affects working memory: an overview.Cogn Process. 2008 Mar;9(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0195-6. Epub 2007 Oct 12. Cogn Process. 2008. PMID: 17932697 Review.
Cited by
-
Spoken verb processing in Spanish: An analysis using a new online resource.Appl Psycholinguist. 2010 Jan;31(1):29-57. doi: 10.1017/s0142716409990154. Appl Psycholinguist. 2010. PMID: 23002318 Free PMC article.
-
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3. Behav Res Methods. 2019. PMID: 30206797 Free PMC article.
-
Semantic memories prime autobiographical memories: General implications and implications for everyday autobiographical remembering.Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):299-312. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0866-9. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30298263
-
Modality dependency of familiarity ratings of Japanese words.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):598-603. doi: 10.3758/bf03213265. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7644320
-
Right and left neglect are not anatomically homologous: A voxel-lesion symptom mapping study.Neuropsychologia. 2021 Nov 12;162:108024. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108024. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Neuropsychologia. 2021. PMID: 34537205 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources