Does comorbidity explain the ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer survival in New Zealand? A retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 21486460
- PMCID: PMC3087712
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-132
Does comorbidity explain the ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer survival in New Zealand? A retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: There are large ethnic differences in cervical cancer survival in New Zealand that are only partly explained by stage at diagnosis. We investigated the association of comorbidity with cervical cancer survival, and whether comorbidity accounted for the previously observed ethnic differences in survival.
Methods: The study involved 1,594 cervical cancer cases registered during 1994-2005. Comorbidity was measured using hospital events data and was classified using the Elixhauser instrument; effects on survival of individual comorbid conditions from the Elixhauser instrument were also assessed. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted cervical cancer mortality hazard ratios (HRs).
Results: Comorbidity during the year before diagnosis was associated with cervical cancer-specific survival: those with an Elixhauser count of ≥3 (compared with a count of zero) had a HR of 2.17 (1.32-3.56). The HR per unit of Elixhauser count was 1.25 (1.11-1.40). However, adjustment for the Elixhauser instrument made no difference to the mortality HRs for Māori and Asian women (compared to 'Other' women), and made only a trivial difference to that for Pacific women. In contrast, concurrent adjustment for 12 individual comorbid conditions from the Elixhauser instrument reduced the Māori HR from 1.56 (1.19-2.05) to 1.44 (1.09-1.89), i.e. a reduction in the excess risk of 21%; and reduced the Pacific HR from 1.95 (1.21-3.13) to 1.62 (0.98-2.68), i.e. a reduction in the excess risk of 35%.
Conclusions: Comorbidity is associated with cervical cancer-specific survival in New Zealand, but accounts for only a moderate proportion of the ethnic differences in survival.
Similar articles
-
Which factors account for the ethnic inequalities in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand?Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;36(4):e251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22504054
-
Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand, 1994-2005.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jul;18(7):955-63. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1163. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009. PMID: 19580365
-
Improving survival disparities in cervical cancer between Māori and non-Māori women in New Zealand: a national retrospective cohort study.Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Apr;34(2):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00506.x. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 23331365
-
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15. Eur J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32422504 Review.
-
Relative risk of cervical cancer in indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Public Health Policy. 2012 May;33(2):148-64. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2012.8. Epub 2012 Mar 1. J Public Health Policy. 2012. PMID: 22377776
Cited by
-
Did the addition of concomitant chemotherapy to radiotherapy improve outcomes in hypopharyngeal cancer? A population-based study.Curr Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(4):266-72. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3085. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Curr Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27536177 Free PMC article.
-
Does the frequency of routine follow-up after curative treatment for head-and-neck cancer affect survival?Curr Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(5):295-306. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4949. Epub 2019 Oct 1. Curr Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31708648 Free PMC article.
-
Improving management of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer using comprehensive medical assessment: a pilot study.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6526-z. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31959129 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3806-3. BMC Cancer. 2017. PMID: 29233120 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of population-based administrative health data for the assessment of cancer non-related comorbidities.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0172814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172814. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28263996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ministry of Health. New Registrations and Deaths 2005. Revised edition. Wellington; 2009. Cancer.
-
- The Descriptive Epidemiology Group of International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2002. Lyon; 2002.
-
- Brewer N, Pearce N, Jeffreys M, White P, Ellison-Loschmann L. Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand 1994-2005. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 2009;18(7):955–963. - PubMed