Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;43(3):896-900.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.02.035.

Pediatric liver transplantation for inherited metabolic liver disease: a single-center experience

Affiliations

Pediatric liver transplantation for inherited metabolic liver disease: a single-center experience

R Rosencrantz et al. Transplant Proc. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: We performed single-center outcome comparison of pediatric recipients who underwent liver transplantation for either genetic or metabolic disease including the clinical impact of using heterozygote parents as living donors.

Materials and methods: Pediatric liver transplant recipients from September 2007 to December 2010 were included. Patients were separated into 2 categories by etiology of liver disease: (1) genetic or metabolic liver disease (G/M) and (2) nongenetic or metabolic liver disease (non-G/M), which included all other remaining etiologies combined. Patient demographics, recipient and donor characteristics, graft type, operative data, recipient complications, allograft and patient survival were analyzed.

Results: Forty liver transplants were performed on 40 patients; 18 were transplanted for G/M; mean waiting time was 101 days for G/M group and 57 days for non-G/M group; 9 patients were listed as status 1, 5 were granted PELD/MELD exceptions; the overall mean PELD/MELD score was 21. Four G/M patients had hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant without microvascular invasion. Overall complications requiring either surgery or interventional radiology occurred in 14 patients-G/M (n = 5); CMV viremia was seen in 11 patients (G/M, n = 1); detectable EBV DNA was detectable in 8 patients (G/M, n = 4), acute cellular rejection was seen in 10 (G/M, n = 5), postransplant lymphoproliferative disease occurred in 2 G/M patients; and 1 G/M patient showed significantly improved posttransplant neurologic motor function. Children with G/M who received a living donor liver transplant from heterozygote parents did well without any signs of expressing underlying metabolic disease. Posttransplant graft and patient overall survival at 12 months for G/M and non-G/M was 100%, and at 36 months, 83% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: The majority of children transplanted for either genetic or metabolic disease were status 1 or awarded UNOS exception points. Cadaveric split livers and live donors including obligate heterozygotes resulted in excellent allograft and patient survival outcomes. In metabolic and genetic liver diseases, close follow-up and timely transplantation can preclude malignant spread and prevent disease progression and consequences, as well as reverse neurologic sequelae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources