Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):511-4.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000068. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

Minimizing electronic health record patient-note mismatches

Affiliations

Minimizing electronic health record patient-note mismatches

Adam B Wilcox et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

We measured the prevalence (or rate) of patient-note mismatches (clinical notes judged to pertain to another patient) in the electronic medical record. The rate ranged from 0.5% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.7%) before a pop-up window intervention to 0.3% (95% CI 0.1% to 1.1%) after the intervention. Clinicians discovered patient-note mismatches in 0.05-0.03% of notes, or about 10% of actual mismatches. The reduction in rates after the intervention was statistically significant. Therefore, while the patient-note mismatch rate is low compared to published rates of other documentation errors, it can be further reduced by the design of the user interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention pop-up window. The top of the note editing screen always displayed the medical record number, name, gender, and date of birth. The intervention added a pop-up window (center) that reiterated the name and medical record number when a note was submitted. (A fictional patient is shown.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Monthly rate of mismatches before and after intervention. The rate of clinician-reported patient-note mismatches (block note requests) and the estimated rate of gender mismatches (parser positive rate) are shown for the months preceding and following the intervention.

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010;362:382–5 - PubMed
    1. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:104–12 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197–203 - PubMed
    1. Wachter RM. Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. JAMA 2006;295:2780–3 - PubMed
    1. Egerman P, Probst M. HIT Policy Committee: Certification Adoption Workgroup Review of February 25th HIT Safety Hearing. 2010. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_11673_911100_0... (accessed 11 Oct 2010).

Publication types