Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S26.
doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S26.

25 years of telepathology research: a bibliometric analysis

Vincenzo Della Mea  1
Affiliations

25 years of telepathology research: a bibliometric analysis

Vincenzo Della Mea. Diagn Pathol. .

Abstract

Background: The first appearance of the word "telepathology" in a scientific paper can be tracked down to 1986, in a famous editorial of Ronald Weinstein. Since that paper, research in telepathology grew up developing different subfields, including static and dynamic telepathology and more recently virtual microscopy. The present work attempts an analysis of research in telepathology, starting from the tools provided by bibliometrics.

Methods: A query has been developed to extract papers related to telepathology and virtual microscopy, and it has been then submitted to Pubmed by means of Entrez Utilities functions. Results obtained in XML have been processed through ad-hoc developed PHP scripts, in order to extract data on Authors, countries, and keywords.

Results: On PubMed, 967 papers related to telepathology and virtual microscopy have been retrieved, which involved 2904 Authors; corresponding authors were from 37 countries. Of those authors, 2213 co-authored just one paper. Papers were published on 344 different journals, of which only 52 from the Pathology field. An analysis of papers per year has been also attempted, that demonstrates variable research output in time.

Conclusions: From the proposed analysis, telepathology seems to have been consistently studied, in time, by about 400 researchers, with occasional participation of many other people. Telepathology research seems also to have varied in time, although some peaks in paper publishing are certainly related to the proceedings of the European congress on telepathology series, when they have been published on journals. However, some clear sign appears that suggests research in traditional telepathology, after a peak in 2000, showed some decline until virtual microscopy became mainstream, topic that currently pushes research again. The low number of clinical trials calls for more randomized studies in telepathology, to enable evidence-based application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of number of papers per author
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of papers per country. Size of circles is correlated to number of papers published.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of papers per year
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Weinstein RS. Prospects for telepathology. Hum Pathol. 1986;17(5):433–4. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(86)80028-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Della Mea V. In: Handbook of Research on Informatics in Healthcare and Biomedicine. A.Lazakidou, editor. Idea Group; 2006. Telepathology and Digital Pathology.
    1. Weingart P. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics. 2005;62:117–131. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7. - DOI
    1. Fritzsche FR, Oelrich B, Dietel M, Jung K, Kristiansen G. European and US publications in the 50 highest ranking pathology journals from 2000 to 2006. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:474–81. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.051656. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donato HM, De Oliveira CF. Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators. Acta Med Port. 2006;19:225–34. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources