Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth
- PMID: 21493349
- PMCID: PMC4199826
- DOI: 10.1177/0194599810397604
Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth
Abstract
Objective: Quality-of-life (QOL) measures targeting youth with hearing loss are useful in population needs assessment, educational placement, and program design and evaluation. This study assesses the cross-sectional validity of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing Module (YQOL-DHH). STUDY DESIGN. Instrument development and cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Recruitment through schools, professional organizations, clinics, and programs for youth who are deaf or hard of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-five candidate items were administered to 230 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years: 49% female, 61% white, 11% mild hearing loss, 20% moderate/moderate-severe, 41% severe/profound, and 28% with cochlear implants. Participants completed individual or group-administered questionnaires by paper and pencil (58%), Web-based English (29%), American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgin Signed English (PSE) (9%) on DVD, or interviewer-supervised ASL or PSE DVD (4%). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) was also completed. Factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and respondent burden were assessed.
Results: Thirty-two items were retained in the final instrument covering 3 domains: self-acceptance/advocacy (14 items, Cronbach α = 0.84), perceived stigma (8 items, Cronbach α = 0.85), and participation (10 items, Cronbach α = 0.86). QOL was not significantly associated with hearing level. One-week test-retest coefficients were acceptable: self-acceptance/ advocacy (0.70), perceived stigma (0.78), and participation 0.92). As predicted, the total CDI-S score was associated in the appropriate direction (P < .0001) with all YQOL-DHH domains. Time to complete the paper-and-pencil version was 12 minutes.
Conclusion: The YQOL-DHH shows good reliability and validity for assessing hearing-specific QOL in adolescents.
Similar articles
-
School placement and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Jan;18(1):47-61. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens039. Epub 2012 Nov 26. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013. PMID: 23184867 Free PMC article.
-
Mode of communication, perceived level of understanding, and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):512-23. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr015. Epub 2011 May 2. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21536686 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of life in youth with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;139(3):294-300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.35. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 23657441
-
Preliminary Validation of Stigma Measures Among Parents of Children Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of Hearing in the United States and Ghana.Ear Hear. 2024 Sep-Oct 01;45(Suppl 1):26S-34S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001471. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Ear Hear. 2024. PMID: 39298627
-
Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults.Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(2):61-75. doi: 10.1159/000508433. Epub 2020 Jul 10. Audiol Neurootol. 2021. PMID: 32653882
Cited by
-
Development and assessment of the health-related quality of life scale for children with hearing loss in China.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21240-y. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39762793 Free PMC article.
-
Caregiver-Reported Indicators of Communication and Social Functioning for Young Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Jul 1;23(3):200-208. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny006. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018. PMID: 29635427 Free PMC article.
-
School placement and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Jan;18(1):47-61. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens039. Epub 2012 Nov 26. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013. PMID: 23184867 Free PMC article.
-
Mode of communication, perceived level of understanding, and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):512-23. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr015. Epub 2011 May 2. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21536686 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):208-19. doi: 10.1177/0194599816640485. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 27118820 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leigh IW, Maxwell-McCaw D, Bat-Chava Y, Christiansen J. Correlates of psychosocial adjustment among deaf adolescents with and without cochlear implants: a preliminary investigation. J Deaf Studies Deaf Ed. 2009;14(2):244–259. - PubMed
-
- Gilman R, Easterbrooks SR, Frey M. A preliminary study of multidimensional life satisfaction among deaf/hard of hearing youth across environmental settings. Soc Ind Res. 2004;66(1-2):143–164.
-
- World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument Group . The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1994. pp. 41–57.
-
- Hawthorne G, Hogan A, Giles E, et al. Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int. J Audiol. 2004;43(4):183–192. - PubMed
-
- Huber M. Health related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(8):1089–1101. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials