Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;145(1):137-45.
doi: 10.1177/0194599810397604.

Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth

Affiliations

Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth

Donald L Patrick et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Quality-of-life (QOL) measures targeting youth with hearing loss are useful in population needs assessment, educational placement, and program design and evaluation. This study assesses the cross-sectional validity of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing Module (YQOL-DHH). STUDY DESIGN. Instrument development and cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Recruitment through schools, professional organizations, clinics, and programs for youth who are deaf or hard of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-five candidate items were administered to 230 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years: 49% female, 61% white, 11% mild hearing loss, 20% moderate/moderate-severe, 41% severe/profound, and 28% with cochlear implants. Participants completed individual or group-administered questionnaires by paper and pencil (58%), Web-based English (29%), American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgin Signed English (PSE) (9%) on DVD, or interviewer-supervised ASL or PSE DVD (4%). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) was also completed. Factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and respondent burden were assessed.

Results: Thirty-two items were retained in the final instrument covering 3 domains: self-acceptance/advocacy (14 items, Cronbach α = 0.84), perceived stigma (8 items, Cronbach α = 0.85), and participation (10 items, Cronbach α = 0.86). QOL was not significantly associated with hearing level. One-week test-retest coefficients were acceptable: self-acceptance/ advocacy (0.70), perceived stigma (0.78), and participation 0.92). As predicted, the total CDI-S score was associated in the appropriate direction (P < .0001) with all YQOL-DHH domains. Time to complete the paper-and-pencil version was 12 minutes.

Conclusion: The YQOL-DHH shows good reliability and validity for assessing hearing-specific QOL in adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leigh IW, Maxwell-McCaw D, Bat-Chava Y, Christiansen J. Correlates of psychosocial adjustment among deaf adolescents with and without cochlear implants: a preliminary investigation. J Deaf Studies Deaf Ed. 2009;14(2):244–259. - PubMed
    1. Gilman R, Easterbrooks SR, Frey M. A preliminary study of multidimensional life satisfaction among deaf/hard of hearing youth across environmental settings. Soc Ind Res. 2004;66(1-2):143–164.
    1. World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument Group . The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1994. pp. 41–57.
    1. Hawthorne G, Hogan A, Giles E, et al. Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int. J Audiol. 2004;43(4):183–192. - PubMed
    1. Huber M. Health related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(8):1089–1101. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms