Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 6;6(4):e18277.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018277.

Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles

Affiliations

Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles

Joshua J Amiel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Brain size relative to body size varies considerably among animals, but the ecological consequences of that variation remain poorly understood. Plausibly, larger brains confer increased behavioural flexibility, and an ability to respond to novel challenges. In keeping with that hypothesis, successful invasive species of birds and mammals that flourish after translocation to a new area tend to have larger brains than do unsuccessful invaders. We found the same pattern in ectothermic terrestrial vertebrates. Brain size relative to body size was larger in species of amphibians and reptiles reported to be successful invaders, compared to species that failed to thrive after translocation to new sites. This pattern was found in six of seven global biogeographic realms; the exception (where relatively larger brains did not facilitate invasion success) was Australasia. Establishment success was also higher in amphibian and reptile families with larger relative brain sizes. Future work could usefully explore whether invasion success is differentially associated with enlargement of specific parts of the brain (as predicted by the functional role of the forebrain in promoting behavioural flexibility), or with a general size increase (suggesting that invasion success is facilitated by enhanced perceptual and motor skills, as well as cognitive ability).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean (± SE) residual brain mass of amphibian and reptile species that were successful (open circles) and unsuccessful (dark squares) in establishing populations outside of their native geographic ranges in seven different biogeographic realms.
AA  =  Australasia, AT  =  Afrotropics, NT  =  Neotropics, NA  =  Nearctic, PA  =  Palearctic, OC  =  Oceania, and IM  =  Indomalaysia. Lack of standard errors in the AT and IM realms reflect low numbers of unsuccessful introductions.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Invasion potential of amphibian and reptile families versus mean residual brain mass of each family.
See Methods for calculation of invasion potential.

References

    1. Hopson JA. Relative brain size and behaviour in Archosaurian reptiles. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1977;8:429–448.
    1. Martin RD. Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature. 1981;293:57–60. - PubMed
    1. Dunbar RIM, Shultz S. Evolution in the social brain. Science. 2007;317:1344–1347. - PubMed
    1. Aiello LC, Wheeler P. The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis. Curr Anthropol. 1995;36:199–221.
    1. Isler K, van Schaik CP. Metabolic costs of brain size evolution. Biol Lett. 2006;2:557–560. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types