Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 27:5:43-52.
doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S6128.

Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases

Affiliations

Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases

Ragip Kayar et al. Breast Cancer (Auckl). .

Abstract

Background: To compare breast volume measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, convenience, and cost.

Methods: Breast volumes of 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy surgery were measured preoperatively by using five different methods (mammography, anatomic [anthropometric], thermoplastic casting, the Archimedes procedure, and the Grossman-Roudner device). Specimen volume after total mastectomy was measured in each patient with the water displacement method (Archimedes). The results were compared statistically with the values obtained by the five different methods.

Results: The mean mastectomy specimen volume was 623.5 (range 150-1490) mL. The breast volume values were established to be 615.7 mL (r = 0.997) with the mammographic method, 645.4 mL (r = 0.975) with the anthropometric method, 565.8 mL (r = 0.934) with the Grossman-Roudner device, 583.2 mL (r = 0.989) with the Archimedes procedure, and 544.7 mL (r = 0.94) with the casting technique. Examination of r values revealed that the most accurate method was mammography for all volume ranges, followed by the Archimedes method.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the most accurate method of breast volume measurement is mammography, followed by the Archimedes method. However, when patient comfort, ease of application, and cost were taken into consideration, the Grossman-Roudner device and anatomic measurement were relatively less expensive, and easier methods with an acceptable degree of accuracy.

Keywords: breast density; macromastia; mammography-negativity; oncoplastic surgery; reduction mammaplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mammographic breast volume measurement method (8).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Grossmann-Roudner-Disks.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Measurement with GR discs.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Anatomic (anthropometric) measurement.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Measurement with Archimedes method.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Measurement with casting method.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The scaled cylinders for specimen volume measurement.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kayar R, Catal H. Macromastia and breast cancer. Izmir Tepecik Hstn Derg. 2007;17:121–30.
    1. Brown RW, Cheng Y, Kurtay M. A formula for surgical modifications of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1342–5. - PubMed
    1. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Chazal SK, Mcmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9. - PubMed
    1. Bullstrode NW, Shrotria S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast. 2001;10:124–6. - PubMed
    1. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3 D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast. 2007;16:137–45. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources