Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;19(6):273-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0103-7.

Predicting 30-day mortality of aortic valve replacement by the AVR score

Affiliations

Predicting 30-day mortality of aortic valve replacement by the AVR score

B M Swinkels et al. Neth Heart J. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to develop a simple risk score to predict 30-day mortality of aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods: In a development set of 673 consecutive patients who underwent AVR between 1990 and 1993, four independent predictors for 30-day mortality were identified: body mass index (BMI) ≥30, BMI <20, previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and recent myocardial infarction. Based on these predictors, a 30-day mortality risk score-the AVR score-was developed. The AVR score was validated on a validation set of 673 consecutive patients who underwent AVR almost two decennia later in the same hospital.

Results: Thirty-day mortality in the development set was ≤2% in the absence of any predictor (class I, low risk), 2-5% in the solitary presence of BMI ≥30 (class II, mild risk), 5-15% in the solitary presence of previous CABG or recent myocardial infarction (class III, moderate risk), and >15% in the solitary presence of BMI <20, or any combination of BMI ≥30, previous CABG or recent myocardial infarction (class IV, high risk). The AVR score correctly predicted 30-day mortality in the validation set: observed 30-day mortality in the validation set was 2.3% in 487 class I patients, 4.4% in 137 class II patients, 13.3% in 30 class III patients and 15.8% in 19 class IV patients.

Conclusions: The AVR score is a simple risk score validated to predict 30-day mortality of AVR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Calibration plot of observed versus AVR score predicted 30-day mortality of the 673 patients in the validation set who underwent AVR

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:9–13. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00134-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards FH, Clark RE, Schwartz M. Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:12–19. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90358-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:816–823. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00106-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1–coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2–S22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yilmaz A, Rehman A, Sonker U, et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:720–725. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.016. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources