Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5212-20.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26152. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Patients rate physician communication about lung cancer

Affiliations

Patients rate physician communication about lung cancer

Judith E Nelson et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: High-quality lung cancer care includes physician-patient communication about the disease and treatment, patient needs/preferences, and care goals. In this study, the authors evaluated communication with patients at all stages across multiple topics.

Methods: A standardized questionnaire asked patients with lung cancer to rate (on 5-point, verbal descriptor scale) the extent of communication with physicians on symptoms, spiritual concerns, practical needs, proxy appointment, living will preparation, prognosis, care goals, potential complications of therapy, life support preferences, and hospice. Communication was defined as inadequate if the patient reported discussing ≥5 of 11 questionnaire topics "not at all" or "a little bit." Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with inadequate communication.

Results: In total, 276 of 348 (79%) eligible patients were enrolled (mean age [±standard deviation], 65 ± 10 years; 55% white, 21% black, and 19% Hispanic; all disease stages). For most topics, the majority of respondents reported that physicians communicated "not at all" or "a little bit." Low ratings were frequent for discussion of emotional symptoms (56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49%-62%), practical needs (71%; 95% CI, 65%-76%), spiritual concerns (80%; 95% CI, 75%-85%), proxy appointment (63%; 95% CI, 57%-69%), living will preparation (90%; 95% CI, 85%-93%), life support preferences (80%; 95% CI, 75%-84%), and hospice (88%; 95% CI, 86%-94%). Communication was inadequate for patients of different ages, stages, and races, although Hispanics were less likely than non-Hispanic whites and blacks to report inadequate communication (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.65).

Conclusions: Across all stages, patients with lung cancer reported low rates of physician-patient communication on key topics, which may increase patient distress, impair decision-making, and compromise clinical outcomes and use patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The screening and recruitment of study participants are illustrated. This chart illustrates the process that led to the enrollment of 276 of 348 patients (79.3% enrollment rate) who were eligible for the current study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This chart illustrates the extent of communication on key topics. Patients with lung cancer reported that their physicians communicated “not at all” or “a little bit.” Patients were asked to rate (on a 5-point, quantitative, verbal descriptor Likert scale) the extent of physician-patient communication on 11 topics, as indicated on the horizontal axis. The chart indicates the proportion of respondents (N = 276), stratified by early stage disease (stages I and II) and late stage disease (stages III and IV), who reported that their physicians discussed the topic “not at all” or “a little bit” (the 2 lowest ratings on the scale).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Griffin JP, Koch KA, Nelson JE, Cooley ME. Palliative care consultation, quality-of-life measurements, and bereavement for end-of-life care in patients with lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) Chest. 2007;132(3 suppl):404S–422S. - PubMed
    1. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, et al. Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1278–1288. - PubMed
    1. Heyland DK, Allan DE, Rocker G, Dodek P, Pichora D, Gafni A. Discussing prognosis with patients and their families near the end of life: impact on satisfaction with end-of-life care. Open Med. 2009;3:e101–e110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47:826–834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–1433. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types