The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening
- PMID: 21496748
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027
The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening
Abstract
Background: On November 16, 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released new breast cancer screening recommendations, resulting in considerable controversy.
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the volume and framing of the public discourse around the mammography recommendations and determine if women were knowledgeable about the new recommendations.
Methods: Two different types of data collection methods were used for this study: (1) a content analysis of news stories and social media posts around the time of the USPSTF announcement and (2) a web-based survey of women aged 40-74 years conducted through Knowledge Networks from December 17, 2009, to January 6, 2010. Data were analyzed in 2010.
Results: The survey sample included 1221 women aged 40-74 years who had never had breast cancer. The majority of the articles and posts (51.9%) did not support the screening recommendations, and 17.6% were supportive. Less than one quarter of the sample could identify the new recommendations for women aged 40-49 years and 50-74 years. Results from logistic regression analyses identified characteristics associated with correct knowledge of the recommendations for each age group. Level of attention paid to the recommendations was significantly associated with accurate knowledge of the recommendations for each age group. Having a mammogram within the past 2 years, "other" race (i.e., not black or white), and having higher levels of education, confidence that recommendations were based on the latest research, and attention paid to the new guidelines were all significantly and positively associated with correct knowledge of the new recommendation for women aged 40-49 years.
Conclusions: The new recommendations confused women (30.0%) more than they helped them understand when to get a mammogram (6.2%). Confusion was greatest among women aged 40-49 years and women who had never had a mammogram or who had one more than 2 years ago. Communication about future recommendations should be pretested to identify strategies and language that may reduce confusion among providers, consumers, and advocacy groups.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Media coverage of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: a commentary.Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):579-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.009. Am J Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 21496760 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Dead by 50: lay expertise and breast cancer screening.Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Mar 8. Soc Sci Med. 2011. PMID: 21440969
-
Media coverage of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: a commentary.Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):579-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.009. Am J Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 21496760 No abstract available.
-
Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge and opinions about the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) committee, the Women's Health Amendment, and the Affordable Care Act: national study after the release of the USPSTF 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation Statement.Prev Med. 2014 Feb;59:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 16. Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24246966
-
Mammographic screening for breast cancer: 2010.Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;77(4):398-404. doi: 10.1002/msj.20194. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010. PMID: 20687187 Review.
-
The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening.Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):843-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.005. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20868889 Review.
Cited by
-
Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages.J Health Commun. 2014;19(1):24-40. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.798384. Epub 2013 Oct 11. J Health Commun. 2014. PMID: 24117281 Free PMC article.
-
"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media.PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231422. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32294139 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Online Information-Seeking and Adherence to Guidelines for Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening.Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Apr 19;15:E45. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170147. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018. PMID: 29679480 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to clinical preventive services guidelines: Population-based online randomized trial.SSM Popul Health. 2015 Nov 27;1:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2015.11.003. eCollection 2015 Dec. SSM Popul Health. 2015. PMID: 29349121 Free PMC article.
-
30+ years of media analysis of relevance to chronic disease: a scoping review.BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8365-x. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32192448 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous