Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1353-66.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62232-5.

Stillbirths: why they matter

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Stillbirths: why they matter

J Frederik Frøen et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

In this first paper of The Lancet's Stillbirths Series we explore the present status of stillbirths in the world-from global health policy to a survey of community perceptions in 135 countries. Our findings highlight the need for a strong call for action. In times of global focus on motherhood, the mother's own aspiration of a liveborn baby is not recognised on the world's health agenda. Millions of deaths are not counted; stillbirths are not in the Global Burden of Disease, nor in disability-adjusted life-years lost, and they are not part of the UN Millennium Development Goals. The grief of mothers might be aggravated by social stigma, blame, and marginalisation in regions where most deaths occur. Most stillborn babies are disposed of without any recognition or ritual, such as naming, funeral rites, or the mother holding or dressing the baby. Beliefs in the mother's sins and evil spirits as causes of stillbirth are rife, and stillbirth is widely believed to be a natural selection of babies never meant to live. Stillbirth prevention is closely linked with prevention of maternal and neonatal deaths. Knowledge of causes and feasible solutions for prevention is key to health professionals' priorities, to which this Stillbirths Series paper aims to contribute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Counting stillbirths: women's health and reproductive rights.
    Kelley M. Kelley M. Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1636-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60279-1. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21496905 No abstract available.
  • Stillbirths: the vision for 2020.
    Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bhutta ZA, Belizán JM, Reddy UM, Rubens CE, Mabeya H, Flenady V, Darmstadt GL; Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Goldenberg RL, et al. Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1798-805. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62235-0. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21496912
  • Addressing the complexity of disparities in stillbirths.
    Spong CY, Reddy UM, Willinger M. Spong CY, et al. Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1635-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60025-1. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21496913 No abstract available.
  • Learning from every stillbirth and neonatal death.
    Roos N, Tunçalp Ö, Kerber K, Allanson E, Costello A, Askew I, Mathai M. Roos N, et al. Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):741-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31352-6. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27560261 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types