Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;14(2):242-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00973.x.

Impact of second-language experience in infancy: brain measures of first- and second-language speech perception

Affiliations

Impact of second-language experience in infancy: brain measures of first- and second-language speech perception

Barbara T Conboy et al. Dev Sci. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Language experience 'narrows' speech perception by the end of infants' first year, reducing discrimination of non-native phoneme contrasts while improving native-contrast discrimination. Previous research showed that declines in non-native discrimination were reversed by second-language experience provided at 9-10 months, but it is not known whether second-language experience affects first-language speech sound processing. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined learning-related changes in brain activity to Spanish and English phoneme contrasts in monolingual English-learning infants pre- and post-exposure to Spanish from 9.5-10.5 months of age. Infants showed a significant discriminatory ERP response to the Spanish contrast at 11 months (post-exposure), but not at 9 months (pre-exposure). The English contrast elicited an earlier discriminatory response at 11 months than at 9 months, suggesting improvement in native-language processing. The results show that infants rapidly encode new phonetic information, and that improvement in native speech processing can occur during second-language learning in infancy.

Keywords: Event-related potentials (ERPs); infants; language development; mismatch negativity; second-language learning; speech discrimination; speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a Spanish-language exposure session. Five native Spanish-speaking researchers (4 female, 1 male) served as “tutors” who used books (10 minutes) and toys (15 minutes) while talking to the infants. Each infant participated with at least 3 different tutors at least 3 times, for a total of 12 sessions. Infants’ parent/caregiver accompanied them, and either one or two parent-infant dyads were present during the sessions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Grand-averaged pre- (9-month) and post-exposure (11-month) ERPs to syllables in double-oddball paradigm. Enlarged area displays results at a representative electrode site (CZ). Infants heard 700 standard stimuli ([ta], black line), 100 English deviants ([tha], blue line), and 100 Spanish deviants ([da], red line). Negative voltages (microvolts) are plotted upward.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean pre- and post-exposure ERP N200-250 and N250-450 peak amplitudes (microvolts) to the 3 stimuli, averaged across 13 electrode sites (5 left hemisphere, FP1, F3, FC1, C3, CP1; 5 right hemisphere, FP2, F4, FC2, C4, CP2; and 3 midline, FZ, CZ, PZ). Error bars represent + 1 SE. Asterisks represent significantly larger amplitudes to deviants vs. the corresponding standard stimuli.

References

    1. Best C, McRoberts G. Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language & Speech. 2003;46(2–3):183–216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch L, Sebastián-Gallés N. Language experience and the perception of a voicing contrast in fricatives: infant and adult data. In: Solé MJ, Recasens D, Romero J, editors. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona, Spain: 2003a. pp. 1987–90.
    1. Bosch L, Sebastián-Gallés N. Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech. 2003b;46(2–3):217–43. - PubMed
    1. Bialystok E. Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2009;12(1):3–11.
    1. Burns TC, Yoshida KA, Hill K, Werker JF. Bilingual and monolingual infant phonetic development. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2007;28(3):455–474.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources