Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.329.

Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Melissa J Azur  1 , Elizabeth A Stuart, Constantine Frangakis, Philip J Leaf
Affiliations

Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Melissa J Azur et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) has emerged as a principled method of dealing with missing data. Despite properties that make MICE particularly useful for large imputation procedures and advances in software development that now make it accessible to many researchers, many psychiatric researchers have not been trained in these methods and few practical resources exist to guide researchers in the implementation of this technique. This paper provides an introduction to the MICE method with a focus on practical aspects and challenges in using this method. A brief review of software programs available to implement MICE and then analyze multiply imputed data is also provided.

Keywords: analyze; missing data; multiple imputation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abayomi K., Gelman A., Levy, M. (2008) Diagnostics for multivariate imputations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 57, 273–291, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00613.x - DOI
    1. Beunckens C., Molenberghs G., Thijs H., Verbeke G. (2007) Incomplete hierarchical data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 457–492, DOI: 10.1177/0962280206075310 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brand J.P.L. (1999) Development, implementation and evaluation of multiple imputation strategies for the statistical analysis of incomplete data sets, unpublished, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
    1. Collins L.M., Schafer J.L., Kam C.M. (2001) A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351, DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demeritas H., Hedeker D. (2008) An imputation strategy for incomplete longitudinal ordinal data. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 4086–4093, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3239 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types