Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.

The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials

Affiliations

The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials

Belinda Borrelli. J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discuss methods of preservation of treatment fidelity in health behavior change trials conducted in public health contexts. METHODS: The treatment fidelity framework provided by the NIH's Behavioral Change Consortium (BCC) (1) includes five domains of treatment fidelity (Study Design, Training, Delivery, Receipt, and Enactment). A measure of treatment fidelity was previously developed and validated using these categories. RESULTS: Strategies for assessment, monitoring, and enhancing treatment fidelity within each of the five treatment fidelity domains are discussed. The previously created measure of treatment fidelity is updated to include additional items on selecting providers, additional confounders, theory testing, and multicultural considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a treatment fidelity plan may require extra staff time and costs. However, the economic and scientific costs of lack of attention to treatment fidelity are far greater than the costs of treatment fidelity implementation. Maintaining high levels of treatment fidelity with flexible adaptation according to setting, provider, and patient is the goal for public health trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Ernst D, Bellg AJ, Czajkowski S, Breger R, DeFrancesco C, Levesque C, Sharp DL, Ogedegbe G, Resnick B, Orwig D. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73(5):852–860. - PubMed
    1. Moncher FJ, Prinz RJ. Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review. 1991;11:247–266.
    1. Kazdin AE. Comparative outcome studies of psychotherapy: methodological issues and strategies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986;54(1):95–105. - PubMed
    1. Yeaton WH, Sechrest L. Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1981;49(2):156–167. - PubMed
    1. Lichstein KL, Riedel BW, Grieve R. Fair tests of clinical trials: a treatment implementation model. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy. 1994;16:1–29.