Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 18:10:40.
doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-40.

Pharmacologic disruption of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 inhibits tumorigenicity and tumor progression in prostate cancer

Affiliations

Pharmacologic disruption of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 inhibits tumorigenicity and tumor progression in prostate cancer

Francesco Crea et al. Mol Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) mediates gene silencing through histone H3K27 methylation. PRC2 components are over-expressed in metastatic prostate cancer (PC), and are required for cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal. 3-Dezaneplanocin-A (DZNeP) is an inhibitor of PRC2 with broad anticancer activity.

Method: we investigated the effects of DZNeP on cell proliferation, tumorigenicity and invasive potential of PC cell lines (LNCaP and DU145).

Results: Exploring GEO and Oncomine databases, we found that specific PRC2 genes (EED, EZH2, SUZ12) predict poor prognosis in PC. Non-toxic DZNeP concentrations completely eradicated LNCaP and DU145 prostatosphere formation, and significantly reduced the expression of CSC markers. At comparable doses, other epigenetic drugs were not able to eradicate CSCs. DZNeP was also able to reduce PC cell invasion. Cells pre-treated with DZNeP were significantly less tumorigenic (LNCaP) and formed smaller tumors (DU145) in immunocompromised mice.

Conclusion: DZNeP is effective both in vitro and in vivo against PC cells. DZNeP antitumor activity is in part mediated by inhibition of CSC tumorigenic potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRC2 gene expression in PC patients. A, comparison of PRC2 mRNA levels in normal prostate, primary and metastatic PC (GEO database). *p < 0.05, **P < 0.01. B, C: prognostic role of EZH2 and SUZ12 mRNA levels in PC sample (Oncomine database).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of DZNeP on PC cells. A, Western blot analysis. (-), untreated cells. B, Annexin-PI staining on untreated and treated cells. Columns mean volume. C, D: cell cycle distribution after DZNeP treattment. Columns, mean volume. Cells were treated with 1 μM DZNeP for 3 and 5 days.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of DZNeP on PS and CSC markers. A, representative picture of cells grown in SCM for 7 days. B, C PS number and volume in untreated and treated cells (1 μM, 7 days). Columns, mean volume; bars standard deviation. D, CSC marker expression. LNCaP cells were treated with DZNeP (1 μM, 3 days) and then sorted as described under "Flow cytometric analysis and separation".
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of DZNeP on invasion and in vivo tumor growth. A, Cells were treated with DZNeP (1 μM, 3 days) and assayed for cell viability at the end of the treatment (trypan blue staining). Alive cells were used for Matrigel invasion assay, as described in "Materials and Methods". Columns, mean volume; bars, standard deviation. **p < 0.01 with respect to untreated cells (T test). B, mRNA levels in invading and non-invading cells (QT-PCR). C, effects of DZNeP on LNCaP cell tumorigenicity. **p < 0.01 (log rank test) with respect to untreated cells. D, effects of DZNeP on DU145 xenograft tumor volume. *p < 0.05 with respect to untreated cells (U test). Star colors refer to dose treatment (blue, 1 μM; red, 10 μM). Number of animals: untreated: 6; 1 and 10 μM: 8. Point, mean value; bar, standard deviation.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bracarda S, de Cobelli O, Greco C, Prayer-Galetti T, Valdagni R, Gatta G, de Braud F, Bartsch G. Cancer of the prostate. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;56:379–396. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lang SH, Frame FM, Collins AT. Prostate cancer stem cells. J Pathol. 2009;217:299–306. doi: 10.1002/path.2478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hurt EM, Kawasaki BT, Klarmann GJ, Thomas SB, Farrar WL. CD44+ CD24(-) prostate cells are early cancer progenitor/stem cells that provide a model for patients with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:756–765. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604242. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hurt EM, Farrar WL. Cancer stem cells: the seeds of metastasis? Mol Interv. 2008;8:140–142. doi: 10.1124/mi.8.3.7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms