[Glass maze in women's leadership]
- PMID: 21504666
[Glass maze in women's leadership]
Abstract
Psychological gender discrimination explanations have changed over the past thirty years, becoming more complex in order to obtain a better understanding of the social reality. At the present moment, one of the most interesting research areas is the one referring to the 'glass maze' phenomenon in women's management careers. The main purpose of this work is to reveal the theoretical evolution in an attempt to explain the leadership study from a gender perspective. The consecutive hypotheses, starting with the labour sexual division idea, are becoming more interactive in order to understand the current labour-social situation. Social psychology has underlined the role of beliefs, observed via gender stereotyped roles, prejudiced attitudes against women, sexist and neo-sexist ideology, or masculine, feminine and androgynous identity development. New psychological interpretations insist on the variability of the gender concept, where gender is sometimes observed through men and women's behaviours, and other times through those behaviour expectations. But gender is mainly observed though the power relations between men and women during social interactions in labour organizations.
Similar articles
-
Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1089-103. doi: 10.1037/a0015703. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19469589
-
Women and women of color in leadership: complexity, identity, and intersectionality.Am Psychol. 2010 Apr;65(3):171-81. doi: 10.1037/a0017459. Am Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20350016
-
Feminist issues in development.World Educ Rep. 1987 Fall;(27):5-8. World Educ Rep. 1987. PMID: 12281154
-
Professional advancement of women in health care management: a conceptual model.Top Health Inf Manage. 1992 Nov;13(2):45-55. Top Health Inf Manage. 1992. PMID: 10122424 Review.
-
Beyond dualism: leading out of oppression.Nurs Forum. 2006 Apr-Jun;41(2):50-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00039.x. Nurs Forum. 2006. PMID: 16669983 Review.
Cited by
-
How do we measure gender discrimination? Proposing a construct of gender discrimination through a systematic scoping review.Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 3;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01581-5. Int J Equity Health. 2022. PMID: 34980116 Free PMC article.
-
Is It Because You Don't Want to? A Content Analysis of Police Executive Leaders' Perceptions of Policewomen's Careers in Europe.Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:713696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713696. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34646204 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous