Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i2-9.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040105.

Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste

Affiliations

Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste

Elizabeth A Smith et al. Tob Control. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: Cigarette filters are made of non-biodegradable cellulose acetate. As much as 766,571 metric tons of butts wind up as litter worldwide per year. Numerous proposals have been made to prevent or mitigate cigarette butt pollution, but none has been effective; cigarette butts are consistently found to be the single most collected item in beach clean-ups and litter surveys.

Methods: We searched the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu) and http://tobaccodocuments.org using a snowball strategy beginning with keywords (eg, 'filter', 'biodegradable', 'butts'). Data from approximately 680 documents, dated 1959-2006, were analysed using an interpretive approach.

Results: The tobacco industry has feared being held responsible for cigarette litter for more than 20 years. Their efforts to avoid this responsibility included developing biodegradable filters, creating anti-litter campaigns, and distributing portable and permanent ashtrays. They concluded that biodegradable filters would probably encourage littering and would not be marketable, and that smokers were defensive about discarding their tobacco butts and not amenable to anti-litter efforts.

Conclusions: Tobacco control and environmental advocates should develop partnerships to compel the industry to take financial and practical responsibility for cigarette butt waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ES was a consultant for the US Justice Department it its case against the tobacco industry.

Comment in

  • Butt really? The environmental impact of cigarettes.
    Healton CG, Cummings KM, O'Connor RJ, Novotny TE. Healton CG, et al. Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i1. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043729. Tob Control. 2011. PMID: 21504916 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Shafey O, Eriksen M, Ross H, et al. The Tobacco Atlas. 3rd edn Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2009
    1. Loker WM. The rise and fall of flue-cured tobacco in the Copán Valley and its environmental and social consequences. Human Ecology 2005;33:299–327
    1. Mwita MM. Ecological impact of tobacco farming in miombo woodlands of Urambo District, Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 2005;43:385–91
    1. Novotny TE, Zhao F. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tob Control 1999;8:75–80 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Novotny TE, Lum K, Smith EA, et al. Cigarette butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:1691–705 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types