Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i36-41.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.041707.

Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs

Affiliations

Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs

John E Schneider et al. Tob Control. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Growing concern over the costs, environmental impact and safety of tobacco product litter (TPL) has prompted states and cities to undertake a variety of policy initiatives, of which litter abatement fees are part. The present work describes a framework and methodology for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees.

Methods: Abatement is associated with four categories of costs: (1) mechanical and manual abatement from streets, sidewalks and public places, (2) mechanical and manual abatement from storm water and sewer treatment systems, (3) the costs associated with harm to the ecosystem and harm to industries dependent on clean and healthy ecosystems, and (4) the costs associated with direct harm to human health. The experiences of the City of San Francisco's recently proposed tobacco litter abatement fee serve as a case study.

Results: City and municipal TPL costs are incurred through manual and mechanical clean-up of surfaces and catchment areas. According to some studies, public litter abatement costs to US cities range from US$3 million to US$16 million. TPL typically comprises between 22% and 36% of all visible litter, implying that total public TPL direct abatement costs range from about US$0.5 million to US$6 million for a city the size of San Francisco. The costs of mitigating the negative externalities of TPL in a city the size of San Francisco can be offset by implementing a fee of approximately US$0.20 per pack.

Conclusions: Tobacco litter abatement costs to cities can be substantial, even when the costs of potential environmental pollution and tourism effects are excluded. One public policy option to address tobacco litter is levying of fees on cigarettes sold. The methodology described here for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees may be useful to state and local authorities who are considering adoption of this policy initiative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual models of sources, accumulation, abatement methods and public costs of tobacco product litter (TPL).

Comment in

  • Butt really? The environmental impact of cigarettes.
    Healton CG, Cummings KM, O'Connor RJ, Novotny TE. Healton CG, et al. Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i1. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043729. Tob Control. 2011. PMID: 21504916 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Coase RH. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1988
    1. Diamond PA. Consumption Externalities and Imperfect Corrective Pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1973;4:526–38
    1. Hines JR. Taxing consumption and other sins. J Econ Perspect 2007;21:49–68
    1. USDA Tobacco Outlook. Electronic Outlook Report from the Electronic Research Service TBS-263. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2007
    1. Novotny TE, Zhao F. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tob Control 1999;8:75–80 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types