Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i45-8.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.041301.

Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste

Affiliations

Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste

Richard L Barnes. Tob Control. 2011 May.

Abstract

The trillions of cigarette butts generated each year throughout the world pose a significant challenge for disposal regulations, primarily because there are millions of points of disposal, along with the necessity to segregate, collect and dispose of the butts in a safe manner, and cigarette butts are toxic, hazardous waste. There are some hazardous waste laws, such as those covering used tyres and automobile batteries, in which the retailer is responsible for the proper disposal of the waste, but most post-consumer waste disposal is the responsibility of the consumer. Concepts such as extended producer responsibility (EPR) are being used for some post-consumer waste to pass the responsibility and cost for recycling or disposal to the manufacturer of the product. In total, 32 states in the US have passed EPR laws covering auto switches, batteries, carpet, cell phones, electronics, fluorescent lighting, mercury thermostats, paint and pesticide containers, and these could be models for cigarette waste legislation. A broader concept of producer stewardship includes EPR, but adds the consumer and the retailer into the regulation. The State of Maine considered a comprehensive product stewardship law in 2010 that is a much better model than EPR. By using either EPR or the Maine model, the tobacco industry will be required to cover the cost of collecting and disposing of cigarette butt waste. Additional requirements included in the Maine model are needed for consumers and businesses to complete the network that will be necessary to maximise the segregation and collection of cigarette butts to protect the environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Comment in

  • Butt really? The environmental impact of cigarettes.
    Healton CG, Cummings KM, O'Connor RJ, Novotny TE. Healton CG, et al. Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i1. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043729. Tob Control. 2011. PMID: 21504916 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Novotny T, Lum K, Smith E, et al. Cigarette butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:1691–705 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litter Free Planet Cigarette Butts: Exposing the Butts. http://www.litterfreeplanet.com/id6.html (accessed 30 Oct 2010).
    1. Keep America Beautiful 2008 National visible Litter Survey and Litter Cost Research Study. http://www.kab.org/site/PageServer?pagename=focus_litter_prevention (accessed 30 Oct 2010).
    1. Micevska T, Warne M, Pablo F, et al. Variation in, and causes of, toxicity of cigarette butts to a cladoceran and microtox. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2006;50:205–12 - PubMed
    1. Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran M, Ventura F. Stimulatory drugs of abuse in surface waters and their removal in a conventional drinking water treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:6809–16 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms