A Bayesian model of binocular perception of 3D mirror symmetrical polyhedra
- PMID: 21505106
- DOI: 10.1167/11.4.11
A Bayesian model of binocular perception of 3D mirror symmetrical polyhedra
Abstract
In our previous studies, we showed that monocular perception of 3D shapes is based on a priori constraints, such as 3D symmetry and 3D compactness. The present study addresses the nature of perceptual mechanisms underlying binocular perception of 3D shapes. First, we demonstrate that binocular performance is systematically better than monocular performance, and it is close to perfect in the case of three out of four subjects. Veridical shape perception cannot be explained by conventional binocular models, in which shape was derived from depth intervals. In our new model, we use ordinal depth of points in a 3D shape provided by stereoacuity and combine it with monocular shape constraints by means of Bayesian inference. The stereoacuity threshold used by the model was estimated for each subject. This model can account for binocular shape performance of all four subjects. It can also explain the fact that when viewing distance increases, the binocular percept gradually reduces to the monocular one, which implies that monocular percept of a 3D shape is a special case of the binocular percept.
Similar articles
-
Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):11. doi: 10.1167/10.6.11. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20884560
-
A new look at binocular stereopsis.Vision Res. 2005 Aug;45(17):2244-55. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.011. Epub 2005 Mar 17. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 15924939
-
Monocular symmetry in binocular vision.J Vis. 2007 Mar 15;7(4):5. doi: 10.1167/7.4.5. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 17461689
-
The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(22):2666-85. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 19577589 Review.
-
How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2232-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18640145 Review.
Cited by
-
Monocular reconstruction of shapes of natural objects from orthographic and perspective images.Front Neurosci. 2024 Apr 15;18:1265966. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1265966. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38686329 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral Symmetry Has No Effect on Stereoscopic Shape Judgments.Iperception. 2021 Aug 31;12(4):20416695211042644. doi: 10.1177/20416695211042644. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug. Iperception. 2021. PMID: 34484656 Free PMC article.
-
The case against probabilistic inference: a new deterministic theory of 3D visual processing.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 30;378(1869):20210458. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0458. Epub 2022 Dec 13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36511407 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Concept of Symmetry and the Theory of Perception.Front Comput Neurosci. 2021 Aug 23;15:681162. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.681162. eCollection 2021. Front Comput Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34497499 Free PMC article.
-
Are mirror-symmetric objects of special importance for 3D shape perception? A reply to Sawada and Pizlo (2022).J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.16. J Vis. 2022. PMID: 35344020 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources