Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 20:12:100.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-100.

Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research

Affiliations

Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research

Charles Weijer et al. Trials. .

Abstract

The cluster randomized trial (CRT) is used increasingly in knowledge translation research, quality improvement research, community based intervention studies, public health research, and research in developing countries. However, cluster trials raise difficult ethical issues that challenge researchers, research ethics committees, regulators, and sponsors as they seek to fulfill responsibly their respective roles. Our project will provide a systematic analysis of the ethics of cluster trials. Here we have outlined a series of six areas of inquiry that must be addressed if the cluster trial is to be set on a firm ethical foundation: 1. Who is a research subject? 2. From whom, how, and when must informed consent be obtained? 3. Does clinical equipoise apply to CRTs? 4. How do we determine if the benefits outweigh the risks of CRTs? 5. How ought vulnerable groups be protected in CRTs? 6. Who are gatekeepers and what are their responsibilities? Subsequent papers in this series will address each of these areas, clarifying the ethical issues at stake and, where possible, arguing for a preferred solution. Our hope is that these papers will serve as the basis for the creation of international ethical guidelines for the design and conduct of cluster randomized trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. London: Arnold; 2000.
    1. The COMMIT Group. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(2):183–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewin S, Dick J, Zwarenstein M, Lombard CJ. Staff training and ambulatory tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a cluster randomized controlled trial in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(4):250–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy A, Robinson A, Hann M, Thompson D, Wilkin D. A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a patient-centred guidebook for patients with ulcerative colitis: effect on knowledge, anxiety, and quality of life. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11(1):64–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00399.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halloran ME, Longini IM Jr, Struchiner CJ. Design and interpretation of vaccine field studies. Epidemiol Rev. 1999;21(1):73–88. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms