Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 20;3(79):79re1.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001807.

Electronic medical records for genetic research: results of the eMERGE consortium

Abel N Kho  1 , Jennifer A Pacheco, Peggy L Peissig, Luke Rasmussen, Katherine M Newton, Noah Weston, Paul K Crane, Jyotishman Pathak, Christopher G Chute, Suzette J Bielinski, Iftikhar J Kullo, Rongling Li, Teri A Manolio, Rex L Chisholm, Joshua C Denny
Affiliations

Electronic medical records for genetic research: results of the eMERGE consortium

Abel N Kho et al. Sci Transl Med. .

Abstract

Clinical data in electronic medical records (EMRs) are a potential source of longitudinal clinical data for research. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network (eMERGE) investigates whether data captured through routine clinical care using EMRs can identify disease phenotypes with sufficient positive and negative predictive values for use in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Using data from five different sets of EMRs, we have identified five disease phenotypes with positive predictive values of 73 to 98% and negative predictive values of 98 to 100%. Most EMRs captured key information (diagnoses, medications, laboratory tests) used to define phenotypes in a structured format. We identified natural language processing as an important tool to improve case identification rates. Efforts and incentives to increase the implementation of interoperable EMRs will markedly improve the availability of clinical data for genomics research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–752. - PubMed
    1. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1400–1405. - PubMed
    1. Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Albert NM, Curtis AB, Stough WG, Gheorghiade M, Heywood JT, McBride ML, Mehra MR, O’Connor CM, Reynolds D, Fonarow GC. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2010;159:635–642. e631. - PubMed
    1. Baron RJ. Quality improvement with an electronic health record: achievable, but not automatic. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:549–552. - PubMed
    1. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D. Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1628–1638. - PubMed

Publication types