Lactogenesis after early postpartum use of the contraceptive implant: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 21508750
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182165ee8
Lactogenesis after early postpartum use of the contraceptive implant: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate lactogenesis after early postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
Methods: Healthy peripartum women with healthy, term newborns who desired the etonogestrel implant for contraception were randomly assigned to early (1-3 days) or standard (4-8 weeks) postpartum insertion. The primary outcomes, time to lactogenesis stage II and lactation failure, were documented by a validated measure. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in time to lactogenesis stage II was defined as 8 additional hours. Secondary data (device continuation and contraceptive use, breast milk analysis, supplementation rates, side effects, and bleeding patterns) were collected at periodic intervals for 6 months.
Results: Sixty-nine women were enrolled. Thirty-five were randomly assigned to early insertion and 34 to standard insertion. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in age, race, parity, mode of delivery, use of anesthesia, or prior breastfeeding experience. Early insertion was demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in time to lactogenesis stage II (early: [mean±standard deviation] 64.3±19.6 hours; standard: 65.2±18.5 hours, mean difference, -1.4 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.6 to 7.7 hours). Early insertion was also demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in incidence of lactation failure (1/34 [3%] in the early insertion group, 0/35 [0%] in the standard insertion group [risk difference, 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08]). Use of formula supplementation was not significantly different between the groups. Milk composition at 6 weeks was not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusion: Breastfeeding outcomes were similar in women who underwent early compared with standard postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel implant.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00847587.
Comment in
-
PURLs: offer this contraceptive to breastfeeding new moms.J Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;60(12):744-6. J Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 22163358 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Lactogenesis and breastfeeding after immediate vs delayed birth-hospitalization insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implant: a noninferiority trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 35964661 Clinical Trial.
-
Timing of Etonogestrel-Releasing Implants and Growth of Breastfed Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):100-107. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002092. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28594758 Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate postpartum contraceptive implant placement and breastfeeding success in postpartum people at risk for low milk supply: A randomized non-inferiority trial.Contraception. 2025 Apr;144:110806. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110806. Epub 2024 Dec 25. Contraception. 2025. PMID: 39730026 Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant with Reduced Weight Gain in an Exclusively Breastfed Infant: Report and Literature Review.Breastfeed Med. 2016 May;11(4):203-6. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0017. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Breastfeed Med. 2016. PMID: 27032034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postpartum hormonal contraception in breastfeeding women.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):441-446. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000571. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31436540 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;14(6):548. doi: 10.3390/ph14060548. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34201123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):568.e1-568.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28610898 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes with postpartum contraception: impact on breastfeeding and birth spacing.Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Jan 13;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40748-016-0040-y. eCollection 2017. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28101373 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review.Contraception. 2016 Sep;94(3):226-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 26. Contraception. 2016. PMID: 26410174 Free PMC article.
-
PURLs: offer this contraceptive to breastfeeding new moms.J Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;60(12):744-6. J Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 22163358 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999;340:589–94.
-
- Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:297–308.
-
- Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Postpartum care visits–11 states and New York City, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:1312–6.
-
- Ogburn JA, Espey E, Stonehocker J. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception 2005;72:426–9.
-
- Echeverry G. Family planning in the immediate postpartum period. Stud Fam Plann 1973;4:33–5.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical