Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;400(9):2871-80.
doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5004-5. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

Investigation of the specificity of Raman spectroscopy in non-invasive blood glucose measurements

Affiliations

Investigation of the specificity of Raman spectroscopy in non-invasive blood glucose measurements

Narahara Chari Dingari et al. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Although several in vivo blood glucose measurement studies have been performed by different research groups using near-infrared (NIR) absorption and Raman spectroscopic techniques, prospective prediction has proven to be a challenging problem. An important issue in this case is the demonstration of causality of glucose concentration to the spectral information, especially as the intrinsic glucose signal is smaller compared with that of the other analytes in the blood-tissue matrix. Furthermore, time-dependent physiological processes make the relation between glucose concentration and spectral data more complex. In this article, chance correlations in Raman spectroscopy-based calibration model for glucose measurements are investigated for both in vitro (physical tissue models) and in vivo (animal model and human subject) cases. Different spurious glucose concentration profiles are assigned to the Raman spectra acquired from physical tissue models, where the glucose concentration is intentionally held constant. Analogous concentration profiles, in addition to the true concentration profile, are also assigned to the datasets acquired from an animal model during a glucose clamping study as well as a human subject during an oral glucose tolerance test. We demonstrate that the spurious concentration profile-based calibration models are unable to provide prospective predictions, in contrast to those based on actual concentration profiles, especially for the physical tissue models. We also show that chance correlations incorporated by the calibration models are significantly less in Raman as compared to NIR absorption spectroscopy, even for the in vivo studies. Finally, our results suggest that the incorporation of chance correlations for in vivo cases can be largely attributed to the uncontrolled physiological sources of variations. Such uncontrolled physiological variations could either be intrinsic to the subject or stem from changes in the measurement conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative Raman spectra acquired from a dog model during a glucose clamping study and corresponding blood glucose concentrations measured over the same time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glucose concentration-time profiles used for our tissue phantom and dog model study. The data here is re-drawn from published reports by the Heise (left) [10] [with permission from John Wiley and Sons] and Arnold [25] (right) [with permission from American Chemical Society] groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Glucose predictions for the three different calibration models developed for the tissue phantom study using the random (red circle), Heise (blue circle) and Arnold (magenta circle) concentration profiles, respectively, plotted on a single Clarke Error Grid.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Glucose predictions for the four different calibration models developed for the dog subject study using the random (A), Heise (B), Arnold (C) and real (D) concentration profiles plotted on the Clarke Error Grid.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klonoff DC. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:433–437. - PubMed
    1. Roe JN, Smoller BR. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1998;15:199–241. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan SJ, Maki T, Borland KM, Mahoney MD, Solomon BA, Muller TE, Monaco AP, Chick WL. Science. 1991;252:718–721. - PubMed
    1. Charles MA. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 1999;1:89–96. - PubMed
    1. Khalil OS. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2004;6:660–697. - PubMed

Publication types