Lethal injuries following building collapse: comparison between autopsy and radiographic findings
- PMID: 21509558
- DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0673-x
Lethal injuries following building collapse: comparison between autopsy and radiographic findings
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of conventional radiology on the assessment of causes of death of human beings after a building collapse and to establish whether the radiographic approach is useful and justifiable.
Materials and methods: Eight victims of a building collapse were subjected to autopsy, toxicology and radiographic examinations of the entire body. The autopsy findings, classified into three groups according to the New Injury Severity Score (NISS), were compared with radiographic findings.
Results: The death of the three individuals in group 1 was ascribed to mechanical asphyxia. Costal fractures, pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema were detected in one case only. The three individuals in group 2 died of mechanical asphyxia associated with cerebral injuries in all cases, abdominal injuries in two and cardiac injuries in one. Plain films showed skull fracture in one case, air within the cardiac chambers in another and diaphragmatic injuries in the third. The two individuals in group 3 died of injuries not compatible with life at the cardiac and abdominal level in both cases and at the cerebral level in one. Radiography showed multiple fractures of the cranium associated with diaphragmatic injuries in one case only. No significant pleuropulmonary radiographic findings were detected in any of the eight victims. Paralytic ileus, identified in all patients, is not strictly correlated to abdominal injuries. Skeletal injuries were all confirmed at conventional radiography.
Conclusions: Conventional radiography allows for the overall assessment of skeletal injuries. Radiographic findings provide limited information about the causes of death, whereas findings related to the concomitant causes of death are more frequent. Conventional radiography should be considered inadequate, especially if the potential of the modern software tools available on current computed tomography and magnetic resonance images is considered.
Similar articles
-
Necessity of including medico-legal autopsy data in epidemiological surveys of individuals with major trauma.Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15. Injury. 2015. PMID: 26089245
-
[Analysis of causes of death in long-term survivors of injuries sustained in traffic accidents].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2002 May-Jun;130(5-6):149-53. doi: 10.2298/sarh0206149m. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2002. PMID: 12395433 Serbian.
-
[Medico-legal assessment of the injuries of fatal victims of building collapse at Katowice International Fair in Katowice/Chorzów on January 28, 2006].Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011 Jan-Mar;61(1):20-8. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011. PMID: 22117484 Polish.
-
[Combination of imaging studies and autopsy in death investigations].Harefuah. 2013 Oct;152(10):581-6, 625. Harefuah. 2013. PMID: 24450029 Review. Hebrew.
-
[The application of X-ray imaging in forensic medicine].Soud Lek. 2014 Jul;59(3):34-8. Soud Lek. 2014. PMID: 25186776 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
Earthquakes from a radiological perspective: what is demanded from the radiologists, and what can we do? A pictorial review.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Jan 8;30(1):30-41. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.232157. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37095695 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources