Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Jul:95 Suppl 1:S83-7.
doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0124-9.

Massive rotator cuff tear treated with a synthetic patch: a case report 16 years after surgery

Affiliations
Case Reports

Massive rotator cuff tear treated with a synthetic patch: a case report 16 years after surgery

R Russo et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Massive rotator cuff tears usually cannot be repaired due to tendon atrophy and marked retraction, as well as muscles fatty degeneration. There are several options for surgical treatment: open or arthroscopic debridement with or without subacromial decompression, arthroscopic isolated biceps tenotomy, partial tendon repair, use of synthetic or biologic patches, tendon transfers, hemiarthroplasty, reverse arthroplasty, and arthrodesis. In this article, we will discuss a particular case of massive rotator cuff tear treated with Marlex mesh. The patient was clinically, radiologically, and MRI checked 16 years after the surgical implant. The active function of shoulder had preserved very well, the Constant score was 76. The X-rays showed a limited progression of osteoarthritis without further cranial migration of the humeral head. At MR cartilage preservation was appreciated, the patch being in good position and the teres minor being smaller than average but it was nonetheless present. This case report can highlight the usefulness of patches in patients with irreparable rotator cuff lesion both for the immediate benefit in terms of pain, strength, movement, and in perspective allowing for the preservation of anatomical structures that might avoid the need for a prosthetic implant over the years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jan;(202):173-83 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Oct;(415):131-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A Suppl 2:35-40 - PubMed
    1. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):484-94 - PubMed
    1. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987 Jul;18(3):445-53 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources