Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):228-37.
doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181faab63.

Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer

Srisuda Ngamkham  1 , Janean E Holden, Diana J Wilkie
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer

Srisuda Ngamkham et al. Cancer Nurs. 2011 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Pain pattern represents how the individual's pain changes temporally with activities or other factors, but researchers have studied less the pattern of pain than its location, intensity, and quality parameters.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pattern groups in outpatients with cancer.

Method: We conducted a comparative, secondary data analysis of data collected from 1994 to 2007. Seven hundred sixty-two outpatients with cancer completed the 0- to 10-point Pain Intensity Number Scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to measure pain location, quality and pattern. From all possible combinations of the 3 types of pain patterns, we created 7 pain pattern groups.

Results: Pain pattern group distribution was as follows: pattern 1 (27%), 2 (24%), 3 (8%), 4 (12%), 5 (3%), 6 (18%), and 7 (8%). A significant higher proportion of patients with continuous pain pattern (patterns 1, 4, 5, and 7) reported pain location in 2 or more sites. Patients with patterns 1, 4, and 7 reported significantly higher worst pain mean scores than did patients with patterns 2, 3, and 6. Patients with pattern 7 reported significantly higher mean scores for the Pain Rating Index-sensory and total number of words selected than did patients with patterns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6.

Conclusions: Using pain pattern groups may help nurses to understand temporal changes in cancer pain and to provide more effective pain management, especially if the pain has a continuous component.

Implications for practice: Nurses or clinicians who are taking care of patients with cancer should recognize that pain patterns are associated with pain location, intensity, and quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of Patients by Pain Pattern
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean Pain Intensity Scores by Pain Pattern Groups
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percent of Possible Pain Quality Scores by Pain Pattern
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jensen MP. The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer. J Pain. 2003;4(1):2–21. - PubMed
    1. Ngamkham S, Catherine V, Finnegan L, Holden J, Wang ZJ, Wilkie D. The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in cancer populations. In review. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham C, Bond SS, Gerkovich MM, Cook MR. Use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency. Pain. 1980;8(3):377–387. - PubMed
    1. McGuire DB. Assessment of pain in cancer inpatients using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1984;11(6):32–37. - PubMed
    1. Dubuisson D, Melzack R. Classification of clinical pain descriptions by multiple group discriminant analysis. Experimental Neurology. 1976;51(2):480–487. - PubMed

Publication types