Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May;72(3):497-506.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.497.

Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release

L A R Stein et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objective: Motivational interviewing to reduce alcohol and marijuana use among incarcerated adolescents was evaluated.

Method: Adolescents (N = 162, 84% male; M = 17.10 years old) were randomly assigned to receive motivational interviewing or relaxation training, with follow-up assessment 3 months after release.

Results: Compared with those who received relaxation training, adolescents who received motivational interviewing had lower rates of alcohol and marijuana use at follow-up, with some evidence for moderating effects of depression. At low levels of depression, adolescents who received motivational interviewing had lower rates of use. Adolescents who received relaxation training and who had high levels of depressive symptoms early in incarceration showed less use at follow-up than those low in depressive symptoms who received relaxation training.

Conclusions: This brief motivational interviewing intervention during incarceration reduces alcohol and marijuana use after release. In addition, depressive symptoms early in incarceration should be considered in treating these adolescents, but more work is needed to extend follow-up period and account for the impact of depression on outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and retention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of treatment on substance use by depressive symptoms: Drinks per drinking day (top panel) and percentage of days used marijuana (bottom panel). Bars with common letters are significantly different. See Table 3.

References

    1. Abram KM, Teplin LA, McClelland GM, Dulcan MK. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2003;60:1097–1108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babor TF, Webb C, Burleson JA, Kaminer Y. Subtypes for classifying adolescents with marijuana use disorders: Construct validity and clinical implications. Addiction. 2002;97:58–69. - PubMed
    1. Bardone AM, Krahn DD, Goodman BM, Searles JS. Using interactive voice response technology and timeline follow-back methodology in studying binge eating and drinking behavior: Different answers to different forms of the same question? Addictive Behaviors. 2000;25:1–11. - PubMed
    1. Barrett H, Slesnick N, Brody JL, Turner CW, Peterson TR. Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7-month assessments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2001;69:802–813. - PubMed
    1. Bein TH, Miller WR, Boroughs JM. Motivational interviewing with alcohol outpatients. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 1993;21:347–356.

Publication types