Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Aug;1809(8):459-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants

Affiliations
Review

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants

Marie-Theres Hauser et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Interest in transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has intensified with the boosting of knowledge on epigenetic mechanisms regulating gene expression during development and in response to internal and external signals such as biotic and abiotic stresses. Starting with an historical background of scantily documented anecdotes and their consequences, we recapitulate the information gathered during the last 60 years on naturally occurring and induced epialleles and paramutations in plants. We present the major players of epigenetic regulation and their importance in controlling stress responses. The effect of diverse stressors on the epigenetic status and its transgenerational inheritance is summarized from a mechanistic viewpoint. The consequences of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance are presented, focusing on the knowledge about its stability, and in relation to genetically fixed mutations, recombination, and genomic rearrangement. We conclude with an outlook on the importance of transgenerational inheritance for adaptation to changing environments and for practical applications. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Epigenetic control of cellular and developmental processes in plants".

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Caspari EW, Marshak RE. The rise and fall of Lysenko. Science. 1965;149:275–278. - PubMed
    1. Pigliucci M. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution. 2007;61:2743–2749. - PubMed
    1. Ruse M. The Darwinian revolution: rethinking its meaning and significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106(Suppl. 1):10040–10047. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koonin EV, Wolf YI. Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian? Biol. Direct. 2009;4:42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gliboff S. “Protoplasm…is soft wax in our hands”: Paul Kammerer and the art of biological transformation. Endeavour. 2005;29:162–167. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources