Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Feb;49(2):128-30.
doi: 10.3340/jkns.2011.49.2.128. Epub 2011 Feb 28.

Screw Fixation without Fusion for Low Lumbar Burst Fracture : A Severe Canal Compromise But Neurologically Intact Case

Affiliations
Case Reports

Screw Fixation without Fusion for Low Lumbar Burst Fracture : A Severe Canal Compromise But Neurologically Intact Case

Kun Soo Jang et al. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

The low lumbar spine is deeply located in flexible segments, and has a physiologic lordosis. Therefore, burst fractures of the low lumbar spine are uncommon injuries. The treatment for such injuries may either be conservative or surgical management according to canal compromise and the neurological status. However, there are no general guidelines or consensus for the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures especially in neurologically intact cases with severe canal compromise. We report a patient with a burst fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, who was treated surgically but without fusion because of the neurologically intact status in spite of severe canal compromise of more than 85%. It was possible to preserve motion segments by removal of screws at one year later. We also discuss why bone fusion was not necessary with review of the relevant literature.

Keywords: Burst fracture; Fusion; Low lumbar spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 16-year-old male patient fell down and sustained unstable L4 bursting fracture. Preoperative computed tomography scans demonstrate about 85% canal encroachment and spinous process fracture in spite of neurologically intact status.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Postoperative simple radiographs show short segment fixation without fusion by posterior approach.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Computed tomographic scans at 1 year follow-up reveal bone healing and canal remodelling with improved canal compromise.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. An HS, Simpson JM, Ebraheim NA, Jackson WT, Moore J, O'Malley NP. Low lumbar burst fractures: comparison between conservative and surgical treatments. Orthopedics. 1992;15:367–373. - PubMed
    1. Chan DP, Seng NK, Kaan KT. Nonoperative treatment in burst fractures of the lumbar spine (L2-L5) without neurologic deficits. Spine. 1993;18:320–325. - PubMed
    1. de Klerk LW, Fontijne WP, Stijnen T, Braakman R, Tanghe HL, van Linge B. Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after conservative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine. 1998;23:1057–1060. - PubMed
    1. el Masry WS, Short DJ. Current concept: spinal injuries and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 1997;10:484–492. - PubMed
    1. Finn CA, Stauffer ES. Burst fractures of the fifth vertebra. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:398–403. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources