Life cycle water consumption and withdrawal requirements of ethanol from corn grain and residues
- PMID: 21520900
- DOI: 10.1021/es104145m
Life cycle water consumption and withdrawal requirements of ethanol from corn grain and residues
Abstract
We assessed the water requirements of ethanol from corn grain and crop residue. Estimates are explicit in terms of sources-green (GW) and blue (BW) water, consumptive and nonconsumptive requirements across the lifecycle, including evapotranspiration, application and conveyance losses, biorefinery uses, and water use of energy inputs, and displaced requirements or credits due to coproducts. Ethanol consumes 50-146 L/vehicle kilometer traveled (VKT) of BW and 1-60 L/VKT of GW for irrigated corn and 0.6 L/VKT of BW and 70-137 L/VKT of GW for rain-fed corn after coproduct credits. Extending the system boundary to consider application and conveyance losses and the water requirements of embodied energy increases the total BW withdrawal from 23% to 38% and BW + GW consumption from 5% to 16%. We estimate that, in 2009, 15-19% of irrigation water is used to produce the corn required for ethanol in Kansas and Nebraska without coproduct credits and 8-10% after credits. Harvesting and converting the cob to ethanol reduces both the BW and GW intensities by 13%. It is worth noting that the use of GW is not without impacts, and the water quantity and water quality impacts at the local/seasonal scale can be significant for both fossil fuel and biofuel.
Similar articles
-
Biochemical suitability of crop residues for cellulosic ethanol: disincentives to nitrogen fertilization in corn agriculture.Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):2013-20. doi: 10.1021/es103252s. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 21348531
-
Implications of corn prices on water footprints of bioethanol.Bioresour Technol. 2011 Apr;102(7):4747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.041. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Bioresour Technol. 2011. PMID: 21306890
-
The unintended energy impacts of increased nitrate contamination from biofuels production.J Environ Monit. 2010 Jan;12(1):218-24. doi: 10.1039/b913137j. Epub 2009 Oct 20. J Environ Monit. 2010. PMID: 20082016
-
Ethanol production: energy, economic, and environmental losses.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007;189:25-41. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35368-5_2. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007. PMID: 17193735 Review.
-
Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 May;1195:28-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05457.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010. PMID: 20536815 Review.
Cited by
-
Scenarios for Low Carbon and Low Water Electric Power Plant Operations: Implications for Upstream Water Use.Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 1;50(21):11460-11470. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03048. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Environ Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27709910 Free PMC article.
-
Water impacts of U.S. biofuels: Insights from an assessment combining economic and biophysical models.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0204298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204298. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30265704 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Liquid Transportation Biofuels in the Pan American Region.Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1356-76. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0543-8. Epub 2015 Jun 4. Environ Manage. 2015. PMID: 26041501 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources