Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study
- PMID: 21521911
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.79913
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study
Abstract
Aim: To comparatively evaluate the shear bond strength of recent tooth-colored restorative materials to dentin.
Materials and methods: Flat dentinal surface were prepared from 60 caries free, extracted human permanent molars and were mounted in acrylic rings. These were randomly divided into four groups - Group A to Group D, according to the restorative material used i.e. Glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), Giomer (Beautifil), an Ormocer-based composite (Admira) and Nano Ceramic restorative material (Ceram X). These restorative materials were applied on dentinal surface of all the specimens using nylon cylinders. The mounted samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and thermocycled. They were then subjected to shear bond strength test using universal testing machine. Data was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and student's 't'-test.
Results: Ceram X (16.63 ± 0.94 MPa) and Admira (17.31 ± 0.95 MPa) were comparable in their bond strength values, but depicted significantly higher bond strength when compared to Beautifil (12.39 ± 1.05 MPa) and Fuji IX (7.76 ± 1.07 MPa).
Conclusion: Nano-ceramic and ormocer-based restorative materials showed better bonding potential to dentin as compared to GIC and Giomer.
Similar articles
-
In vitro shear bond strength of resin-based luting cements to dentin.Gen Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):e215-20. Gen Dent. 2012. PMID: 22782054
-
Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength.J Prosthodont. 2009 Dec;18(8):670-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00502.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13. J Prosthodont. 2009. PMID: 19682222
-
Dentin bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive using self- and light-cured composites.Am J Dent. 2009 Aug;22(4):215-8. Am J Dent. 2009. PMID: 19824557
-
Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: a review.Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):35D-40D. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763916 Review.
-
Resin-based composite as a direct esthetic restorative material.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 Jun;32(5):14-23; quiz 24, 38. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011. PMID: 21755892 Review.
Cited by
-
In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 2;2024:9420336. doi: 10.1155/2024/9420336. eCollection 2024. ScientificWorldJournal. 2024. PMID: 38205145 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of Bis-GMA free and Bis-GMA containing resin composite as posterior restoration on marginal integrity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03759-5. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 38114979 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):192-196. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1362. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016. PMID: 27843248 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of Effect of Dietary Solvents on Bond Strength of Compomer, Ormocer, Nanocomposite and Activa Bioactive Restorative Materials.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Aug 27;9(5):453-457. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_47_19. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019. PMID: 31620377 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and modes of failure of five different reinforced glass ionomer restorative cements to TheraCal LC: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Feb;27(2):200-204. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_260_23. Epub 2024 Feb 8. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024. PMID: 38463478 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources