Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):7-13.
doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79913.

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study

N Manuja et al. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Aim: To comparatively evaluate the shear bond strength of recent tooth-colored restorative materials to dentin.

Materials and methods: Flat dentinal surface were prepared from 60 caries free, extracted human permanent molars and were mounted in acrylic rings. These were randomly divided into four groups - Group A to Group D, according to the restorative material used i.e. Glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), Giomer (Beautifil), an Ormocer-based composite (Admira) and Nano Ceramic restorative material (Ceram X). These restorative materials were applied on dentinal surface of all the specimens using nylon cylinders. The mounted samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and thermocycled. They were then subjected to shear bond strength test using universal testing machine. Data was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and student's 't'-test.

Results: Ceram X (16.63 ± 0.94 MPa) and Admira (17.31 ± 0.95 MPa) were comparable in their bond strength values, but depicted significantly higher bond strength when compared to Beautifil (12.39 ± 1.05 MPa) and Fuji IX (7.76 ± 1.07 MPa).

Conclusion: Nano-ceramic and ormocer-based restorative materials showed better bonding potential to dentin as compared to GIC and Giomer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources