Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1
- PMID: 21522216
- PMCID: PMC2953313
Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1
Abstract
To prepare an athlete for the wide variety of activities needed to participate in their sport, the analysis of fundamental movements should be incorporated into pre-participation screening in order to determine who possesses, or lacks, the ability to perform certain essential movements. In a series of two articles, the background and rationale for the analysis of fundamental movement will be provided. In addition, one such evaluation tool that attempts to assess the fundamental movement patterns performed by an individual, the Functional Movement Screen (FMS(™)), will be described. Three of the seven fundamental movement patterns that comprise the FMS(™) are described in detail in Part I: deep squat, hurdle step, and in-line lunge. Part II of this series, which will be published in the August issue of NAJSPT, will provide a brief review of the analysis of fundamental movements, as well a detailed description of the four additional patterns that complement those presented in Part I (to complete the total of seven fundamental movement patterns which comprise the FMS(™)): shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability.The intent of this two part series is to introduce the concept of the evaluation of fundamental movements, whether it is the FMS(™) system or a different system devised by another clinician. Such a functional assessment should be incorporated into pre-participation screening in order to determine whether the athlete has the essential movements needed to participate in sports activities with a decreased risk of injury.
Figures

Upper torso is parallel with tibia or toward vertical
Femur below horizontal
Knees are aligned over feet
Dowel aligned over feet


Upper torso is parallel with tibia or toward vertical
Femur is below horizontal
Knees are aligned over feet
Dowel is aligned over feet
2×6 board required under feet

Tibia and upper torso are not parallel
Femur is not below horizontal
Knees are not aligned over feet
Lumbar flexion is noted
2×6 board required under feet

Hips, knees and ankles remain aligned in the sagittal plane
Minimal to no movement is noted in lumbar spine
Dowel and string remain parallel


Alignment is lost between hips, knees, and ankles
Movement is noted in lumbar spine
Dowel and string do not remain parallel

Contact between foot and string occurs
Loss of balance is noted

Dowel contacts remain with lumbar spine extension
No torso movement is noted
Dowel and feet remain in sagittal plane
Knee touches board behind heel of front foot


Dowel contacts do not remain with lumbar spine extension
Movement is noted in torso
Dowel and feet do not remain in sagittal plane
Knee does not touch behind heel of front foot

Loss of balance is noted
References
-
- Gray G. Lower Extremity Functional Profile. Winn Marketing; 1995
-
- Fields KB, Delaney M. Focusing on the pre-participation sports examination. J Fam Pract. 1989;30:304–312 - PubMed
-
- Kibler WB, Chandler TJ, Uhl T, Maddux RE. A musculoskeletal approach to the preparticipation physical examination: preventing injury and improving performance. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:525–527 - PubMed
-
- Meeuwisse WH, Fowler PJ. Frequency and predictability of sports injuries in intercollegiate athletes. Can J Sport Sci. 1988;13:35–42 - PubMed
-
- Metzl JD. The adolescent pre-participation physical examination: Is it helpful? Clin Sports Med. 2000;19:577–592 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous