Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;82(8):1036-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.034. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

Association between Cerebral Performance Category, Modified Rankin Scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest

Affiliations

Association between Cerebral Performance Category, Modified Rankin Scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest

Jon C Rittenberger et al. Resuscitation. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and discharge disposition are commonly used to determine outcomes following cardiac arrest. This study tested the association between these outcome measures.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of subjects who survived to hospital discharge between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2009 was conducted. Charts were reviewed for outcomes (CPC, mRS, and discharge disposition). Discharge disposition was classified in 6 categories: home with no services, home with home healthcare, acute rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility, long term acute care facility, and hospice. Intra-and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated for outcome measures. Rates of "good outcome" (defined as a CPC of 1-2, mRS of 0-3, or discharge disposition to home or acute rehabilitation facility) were also determined. Kendall's tau correlation coefficients explored relationships among measures.

Results: A total of 211 charts were reviewed. Mean age was 60 years (SD 16), the majority (75%) were white males, in- and out-of hospital cardiac arrests were equally prevalent, and ventricular dysrhythmia was most common (N=109, 52%). Half of the subjects were comatose following resuscitation and 75 (35%) received therapeutic hypothermia. Inter-rater percentage agreement for CPC and mRS abstraction was 95.24% (kappa 0.89, p<0.001) and 95.24% (kappa 0.90, p<0.001) respectively. "Good outcomes" were found in 44 subjects (20%) using the CPC definition, 47 subjects (22%) using the mRS definition, and 129 subjects (61%) subjects using discharge disposition definition. There was fair relationship between the CPC and mRS (tau 0.43) and poor relationships between CPC and discharge disposition (tau 0.23) and between mRS and discharge disposition (tau 0.25).

Conclusions: Determination of the CPC, mRS and discharge disposition at hospital discharge is reliable from chart review. These instruments provide widely differing estimates of "good outcome". Agreement between these measures ranges from poor to fair. A more nuanced outcome measure designed for the post-cardiac arrest population is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of the Modified Rankin Scale Abbreviations: mRS = Modified Rankin Scale
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots comparing measures at hospital discharge. Figure 2A demonstrates the CPC and mRS interactions (tau 0.43). Figure 2B illustrates the CPC and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.23). Figure 2C illustrates the mRS and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.25). Abbreviations: mRS=Modified Rankin Scale, CPC= Cerebral Performance Category, Home- = discharge to home with no services, Home-Care= discharge to home with home health care, Acute rehabilitation= discharge to acute rehabilitation facility, SNF= skilled nursing facility, LTAC= long-term acute care hospital, Hospice= discharge to home hospice or hospice facility.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots comparing measures at hospital discharge. Figure 2A demonstrates the CPC and mRS interactions (tau 0.43). Figure 2B illustrates the CPC and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.23). Figure 2C illustrates the mRS and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.25). Abbreviations: mRS=Modified Rankin Scale, CPC= Cerebral Performance Category, Home- = discharge to home with no services, Home-Care= discharge to home with home health care, Acute rehabilitation= discharge to acute rehabilitation facility, SNF= skilled nursing facility, LTAC= long-term acute care hospital, Hospice= discharge to home hospice or hospice facility.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots comparing measures at hospital discharge. Figure 2A demonstrates the CPC and mRS interactions (tau 0.43). Figure 2B illustrates the CPC and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.23). Figure 2C illustrates the mRS and discharge disposition interactions (tau 0.25). Abbreviations: mRS=Modified Rankin Scale, CPC= Cerebral Performance Category, Home- = discharge to home with no services, Home-Care= discharge to home with home health care, Acute rehabilitation= discharge to acute rehabilitation facility, SNF= skilled nursing facility, LTAC= long-term acute care hospital, Hospice= discharge to home hospice or hospice facility.

References

    1. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I Study Group (BRCT-1) Randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:397–403. - PubMed
    1. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480–4. - PubMed
    1. Cummins RO, Chamberlain D, Hazinski MF, et al. Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital ‘Utstein Style’: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, and the Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa. Circulation. 1997;95:2213–9. - PubMed
    1. Raina KD, Callaway C, Rittenberger JC, Holm MB. Neurological and functional status following cardiac arrest: method and tool utility. Resuscitation. 2008;79(2):249–256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7. - PubMed

Publication types