Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;21(12):2712-21.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr047. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke

Affiliations

Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke

Eric Zarahn et al. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

There is substantial interpatient variation in recovery from upper limb impairment after stroke in patients with severe initial impairment. Defining recovery as a change in the upper limb Fugl-Meyer score (ΔFM), we predicted ΔFM with its conditional expectation (i.e., posterior mean) given upper limb Fugl-Meyer initial impairment (FM(ii)) and a putative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recovery measure. Patients with first time, ischemic stroke were imaged at 2.5 ± 2.2 days poststroke with 1.5-T fMRI during a hand closure task alternating with rest (fundamental frequency = 0.025 Hz, scan duration = 172 s). Confirming a previous finding, we observed that the prediction of ΔFM by FM(ii) alone is good in patients with nonsevere initial hemiparesis but is not good in patients with severe initial hemiparesis (96% and 16% of the total sum of squares of ΔFM explained, respectively). In patients with severe initial hemiparesis, prediction of ΔFM by the combination of FM(ii) and the putative fMRI recovery measure nonsignificantly increased predictive explanation from 16% to 47% of the total sum of squares of ΔFM explained. The implications of this preliminary negative result are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of patient sample composition.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative correlation coefficient (see text for description) versus FMii for the nonimaged sample. The arrow marks where we specified the (inclusive) threshold (which corresponds to FMii ≥ 56) for defining severe FMii based on where the cumulative correlation coefficient begins to decrease. We chose to place this threshold slightly before the apparent decrease so as to be less likely to misclassify severe strokes as nonsevere.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Predicted (posterior mean) versus observed ΔFM when using either 1) FMii (patients with nonsevere FMii: white squares; patients with severe FMii: black squares) or 2) FMii and Z (patients with nonsevere FMii: red circles; patients with severe FMii: blue circles) as the information in determining the posterior density of ΔFM. The SPE for a given datum is the (vertical distance to the identity line)2. All data plotted correspond to the imaged sample.

References

    1. Akaike H. New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;Ac19:716–723.
    1. Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1245–1254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Hacklander T, Pawelec D, Mau J, Freund HJ. Recovery of motor functions following hemiparetic stroke: a clinical and magnetic resonance-morphometric study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:273–281. - PubMed
    1. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2002.
    1. Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, Baron JC. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke. 2001;32:2534–2542. - PubMed

Publication types