Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010;20(5):380-386.
doi: 10.1080/10508422.2010.491764.

Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization from the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects

Tsiao Yi Yap  1 , Kathleen A Kassimatis, Eric Kodish
Affiliations

Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization from the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects

Tsiao Yi Yap et al. Ethics Behav. 2010.

Abstract

Randomization is the "gold standard" design for clinical research trials, and is accepted as the best way to reduce bias. Although some controversy remains over this matter, we believe equipoise is the fundamental ethical requirement for conducting a randomized clinical trial. Despite much attention to the ethics of randomization, the moral psychology of this study design has not been explored. This paper analyzes the ethical tensions that arise from conducting these studies, and examines the moral psychology of this design from the perspectives of physician-investigators and patient-subjects. We conclude with a discussion of the practical implications of this analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chalmers TC. Randomization of the First Patient. Medical Clinics of North America. 1975;59:1035–1038. - PubMed
    1. Doris J, Stich S. Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2006. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries.moral-psych-emp/
    1. Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM, Houssami N. Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology: Understanding and Attitudes Predict Willingness to Participate. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001;19:3554–3561. - PubMed
    1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine. A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;268:2420–2425. - PubMed
    1. Featherstone K, Donovan JL. Random Allocation or Allocation at Random? Patients’ Perspectives of Participation in a Randomised Controlled Trial. British Medical Journal. 1998;317:1177–1180. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources