Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;29(1):71-6.
doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i1.7568.

Trends in choosing place of delivery and assistance during delivery in Nanded district, Maharashtra, India

Affiliations

Trends in choosing place of delivery and assistance during delivery in Nanded district, Maharashtra, India

Geeta S Pardeshi et al. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Delivery in a medical institution promotes child survival and reduces the risk of maternal mortality. Many initiatives under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) focus on increasing the institutional deliveries. This study describes the trends in choosing place of delivery in Nanded district at the end of the first phase of the mission. Key informants were interviewed to document the initiatives under NRHM implemented in the district. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in 30 villages selected using one stage cluster-sampling method. A house-to-house survey was conducted in June 2009. A set of structured open-ended questionnaire was used for interviewing all women who had delivered during January 2004-May 2009. The outcomes studied were place of delivery and assistance during delivery. Analysis was done by calculating chi-square test and odds ratio. Interventions to improve the quality of health services and healthcare-seeking behaviour were implemented successfully in the district. The proportion of institutional deliveries increased from 42% in 2004 to 69% in 2009. A significant increase was observed in the proportion of institutional deliveries [60% vs 45%; chi2 = 173.85, p < 0.05, odds ratio (OR) = 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-1.97)] in the NRHM period compared to the pre-NRHM period. The deliveries in government institutions and in private institutions also showed a significant rise. The proportion of deliveries assisted by health personnel increased significantly during the NRHM period [62% vs 49%; chi2 = 149.39; p < 0.05, OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.58-1.89]. However, less than 10% of the deliveries in the home (range 2-9%) were assisted by health personnel throughout the study period. There was a wide geographic variation in place of delivery among the study villages. The results showed a significant increase in the proportion of institutional deliveries and deliveries assisted by health personnel in the NRHM period. Since a less proportion of deliveries in the home is conducted by health personnel, the focus should be on increasing the institutional deliveries. Special and innovative interventions should be implemented in the villages with a less proportion of institutional deliveries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Trends in choosing places for institutional deliveries, 2004–2009

References

    1. Dasgupta A, Deb S. Intranatal care practices in a backward village of West Bengal. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2009;59:312–6.
    1. India . National Commission on Population. National Population Policy, 2000. New Delhi: National Commission on Population; 2000. p. 2. ( http://populationcommission.nic.in/npp_obj.htm, accessed on 9 September 2010).
    1. Venkat B, Sudish SB, Durvasala R. Millennium health goals and India: status and progress. Hyderabad: Administrative Staff College of India; 2004. p. 18.
    1. International Institute for Population . Sciences. National family health survey (NFHS)-3, 2005–06: India. V. I. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007. pp. 208–20.
    1. International Institute for Population Sciences . National family health survey (NFHS)-3, India, 2005–06: Maharashtra. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2008. p. 77.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources