Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;28(10):2751-60.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr081. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

Genome reduction by deletion of paralogs in the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus

Affiliations

Genome reduction by deletion of paralogs in the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus

Haiwei Luo et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Several isolates of the marine cyanobacterial genus Prochlorococcus have smaller genome sizes than those of the closely related genus Synechococcus. In order to test whether loss of protein-coding genes has contributed to genome size reduction in Prochlorococcus, we reconstructed events of gene family evolution over a strongly supported phylogeny of 12 Prochlorococcus genomes and 9 Synechococcus genomes. Significantly, more events both of loss of paralogs within gene families and of loss of entire gene families occurred in Prochlorococcus than in Synechococcus. The number of nonancestral gene families in genomes of both genera was positively correlated with the extent of genomic islands (GIs), consistent with the hypothesis that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is associated with GIs. However, even when only isolates with comparable extents of GIs were compared, significantly more events of gene family loss and of paralog loss were seen in Prochlorococcus than in Synechococcus, implying that HGT is not the primary reason for the genome size difference between the two genera.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>IG</sc>. 1.
FIG. 1.
ML tree (topology only) of Prochlorococcus (P.) and Synechococcus (S.) genomes used in analyses. Numbers on the branches represent the percentage of 100 bootstrap samples supporting the branch.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 2.
FIG. 2.
Numbers of reconstructed events of gain (+) and loss (-) of entire gene families in the ingroup phylogeny (based on fig. 1). “Boxes” indicate branches on which losses exceed gains.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 3.
FIG. 3.
Numbers of reconstructed events of gain (+) and loss (-) of paralogs in gene families in the ingroup phylogeny (based on fig. 1). Boxes indicate branches on which losses exceed gains.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 4.
FIG. 4.
(A) Relationship between number of paralogs lost within families and number of families lost in phylogeny of Prochlorococcus (solid circles) and Synechococcus (open circles); r = 0.900; P < 0.001. (B) Relationship between the number of ingroup-specific families and GI length in Prochlorococcus (solid circles) and Synechococcus (open circles); r = 0.741; P = 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz R, Bartels D, Best A, et al. (26 co-authors) The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke GR, Moran NA. Massive genomic decay in Serratia symbiotica, a recently evolved symbiont of aphids. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:195–208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X, Zheng J, Fu Z, Nan P, Zhong Y, Lonardi S, Jiang T. Assignment of orthologous genes via genome rearrangement. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2005;2:302–315. - PubMed
    1. Coleman ML, Sullivan MB, Martiny AC, Steglich C, Barry K, DeLong EF, Chisholm SW. Genomic islands and the ecology and evolution of Prochlorococcus. Science. 2006;311:1768–1770. - PubMed

Publication types