Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 May;127(5):1790-1795.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf1c6.

Prospective computerized analyses of sensibility in breast reconstruction with non-reinnervated DIEP flap

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective computerized analyses of sensibility in breast reconstruction with non-reinnervated DIEP flap

Fabio Santanelli et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the definitive standard for autologous breast reconstruction because of its ability to restore shape, its consistency, and its static and dynamic symmetry, but the degree of spontaneous sensory recovery is still widely discussed. To clarify the real need for sensitive nerve coaptation, return of sensibility in DIEP flaps was investigated using a pressure-specifying sensory device.

Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with breast cancer scheduled for modified radical mastectomy, axillary node dissection, and immediate reconstruction with cutaneous-adipose DIEP flaps without nerve repair were enrolled in the study. Sensibility for one and two points, static and moving, was tested preoperatively on the breasts and abdomen, and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months on the DIEP flaps. A t test was used for comparison of paired data and to investigate which factors affected sensory recovery.

Results: Preoperative healthy breast and abdomen pressure thresholds were lower for two-point than one-point discrimination and for moving discriminations compared with static ones at 6 and 12 months. Although they were significantly higher than those for contralateral healthy breasts (p < 0.05), pressure thresholds in DIEP flaps at 12 months were lower than at 6 months, showing a significant progressive sensory recovery (p < 0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the best sensibility recovery was found at the inferior lateral quadrant, the worst at the superior medial quadrant. Age and flap weight were factors related to the performance of sensory recovery.

Conclusions: DIEP flap transfer for immediate breast reconstruction undergoes satisfactory progressive spontaneous sensitive recovery at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and operative time spent dissecting sensitive perforator branches and their coaptation in recipient site could be spared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:752–764.
    1. Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Clifford Y, et al. The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:394–399.
    1. Blondeel PN, Demuynck M, Mete D, et al. Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: Sensational or senseless? Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:37–44.
    1. Lapatto O, Asko-Seljavaara S, Tikiainen E, Suominen E. Return of sensibility and final outcome of breast reconstructions using free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1995;29:33–38.
    1. Temple CLF, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, Mac Dermid J, Gan BS, Ross D. Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2119–2127.

Publication types