Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 May;127(5):1875-1889.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820e90c3.

Pathways of sensory recovery after face transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Pathways of sensory recovery after face transplantation

Maria Siemionow et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: Severely disfiguring facial injuries have a devastating impact on the patient's quality of life. The advent of facial allotransplantation has allowed optimal anatomical reconstruction to be achieved; however, the need for lifelong immunosuppression and unpredictable functional outcomes preclude it from routine acceptance in clinical practice. Evidence from published reports on the first four face transplant recipients indicates improved and accelerated return of sensation to the facial allograft despite suboptimal repair of the sensory nerves.

Methods: The authors performed a comparative analysis of the sensory outcomes following face transplantation with the sensory recovery achieved after conventional nerve repair, autologous face and scalp replantation, and vascularized free tissue transfer.

Results: Sensory recovery following face transplantation, even when the sensory nerves were not repaired, was comparable to the outcome of microsurgical repair of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve and innervated free flaps.

Conclusions: Nearly normal sensory recovery can be expected following facial allotransplantation with or without repair of the sensory nerves. The mechanisms responsible for this surprising outcome include preservation of normal density of the receptors within the facial allograft, regeneration from the recipient bed and allograft margins, transmission of the sensory inputs through afferent fibers contained in the facial nerve, nervi nervorum of the facial nerve, or trigeminofacial communicating rami. Furthermore, immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus contributes to the accelerated nerve regeneration. The minimum requirements for quantitative sensory testing and timing of the follow-up assessments are outlined to facilitate comparison of sensory outcomes after face transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.
    1. Robinson PP, Smith KG. A study on the efficacy of late lingual nerve repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;34:96–103.
    1. Robinson PP, Loescher AR, Smith KG. A prospective, quantitative study on the clinical outcome of lingual nerve repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:255–263.
    1. Hillerup S, Stoltze K. Lingual nerve injury: II. Observations on sensory recovery after micro-neurosurgical reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:1139–1145.
    1. Tay AB, Poon CY, Teh LY. Immediate repair of transected inferior alveolar nerves in sagittal split osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2476–2481.

LinkOut - more resources