Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Apr 11;2(1):123-8.
doi: 10.1159/000324750.

Penetrating keratoplasty after radial keratotomy and recurrent immune overreaction

Affiliations
Case Reports

Penetrating keratoplasty after radial keratotomy and recurrent immune overreaction

Raffaele Nuzzi et al. Case Rep Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

A 32-year-old man suffering from keratoconus was treated with radial keratotomy. Twenty weeks later, he presented visual deterioration, edema and corneal perforation. A penetrating keratoplasty was required. The postoperative course was regular, but after 9 months, the patient presented kerato-uveitis. Subsequent phlogistic relapses occurred approximately every 6 months during the following 5 years. The performed cultures were positive only during the first episode. Radial keratotomy is not indicated in keratoconus. The multiple relapses of kerato-uveitis could not be explained by infection, and we hypothesized that they may be due to a 'traumatic memory' of the cornea caused by the several suffered traumatisms, without clinical features of corneal graft rejection. The risks of new penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery are high. As the cornea is the tissue with the highest sensitivity in the body, we tried to explain the relapsing kerato-uveitis as a consequence of the disruption of the nervous corneal network.

Keywords: Kerato-uveitis; Keratoconus; Penetrating keratoplasty; Radial keratotomy; Recurrent immune overreaction; Traumatic memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Corneal findings of 16 radial paracentral scars, white opacity at the superficial and deep corneal stroma, corneal edema and folds of the Descemet membrane. Frontal (a) and lateral (b) view.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weed KH, McEwen CJ, Giles T, Low J, McGhee CN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye. 2008;22:534–541. - PubMed
    1. Lois N, Kowal VO, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Gault JA, Raber IM. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1989–1995. Cornea. 1997;16:623–629. - PubMed
    1. Nishida T. The cornea: stasis and dynamics. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;112:179–212. - PubMed
    1. Durand L, Monnot JP, Burillon C, Assi A. Complications of radial keratotomy: eyes with keratoconus and late wounds dehiscence. Refract Corneal Surg. 1992;8:311–314. - PubMed
    1. Wagoner MD, Ba-Abbad R, Al-Mohaimeed M, Al-Swailem S, Zimmerman MB. King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Cornea Transplant Study Group. Postoperative complications after primary adult penetrating keratoplasty: prevalence and impact on graft survival. Cornea. 2009;28:385–394. - PubMed

Publication types