Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 14;6(4):e18498.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018498.

Early growth response gene-2 (Egr-2) regulates the development of B and T cells

Affiliations

Early growth response gene-2 (Egr-2) regulates the development of B and T cells

Suling Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding of how transcription factors are involved in lymphocyte development still remains a challenge. It has been shown that Egr-2 deficiency results in impaired NKT cell development and defective positive selection of T cells. Here we investigated the development of T, B and NKT cells in Egr-2 transgenic mice and the roles in the regulation of distinct stages of B and T cell development.

Methods and findings: The expression of Egr1, 2 and 3 were analysed at different stages of T and B cell development by RT-PCT and results showed that the expression was strictly regulated at different stages. Forced expression of Egr-2 in CD2(+) lymphocytes resulted in a severe reduction of CD4(+)CD8(+) (DP) cells in thymus and pro-B cells in bone marrow, which was associated with reduced expression of Notch1 in ISP thymocytes and Pax5 in pro-B cells, suggesting that retraction of Egr-2 at the ISP and pro-B cell stages is important for the activation of lineage differentiation programs. In contrast to reduction of DP and pro-B cells, Egr-2 enhanced the maturation of DP cells into single positive (SP) T and NKT cells in thymus, and immature B cells into mature B cells in bone marrow.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that Egr-2 expressed in restricted stages of lymphocyte development plays a dynamic, but similar role for the development of T, NKT and B cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Defective thymus development in Egr-2 transgenic mice.
A). confirmation of presence of transgene by PCR. B). expression of Egr-2 in thymocytes from wild type, Egr-2 cKO and two Egr-2 cTg mouse lines (14 and 18) determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The relative expression was measured after normalization against b-actin. * Egr-2 was not detected in Egr-2 cKO T cells. C). Thymus size in wild type, Egr-2 cTg and Egr-2 cKO mice. D). Thymocytes from wild type and Egr-2 transgenic mice were stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8. E). Expression of CD3, TCRβ and CD5 by gated CD4+ or CD8+SP T cells in thymus. The data are representative of three experiments in which 3 to 5 mice from each group were used.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Development of thymocytes.
A). Absolute number of thymocyte subpopulations in thymus. The ISP cells were defined as CD4CD8+CD3 (see Fig. 1E). B). The subpopulations of DN cells in thymus were examined by analysis of CD25 and CD44 expression on gated CD4CD8 DN cells. C). Absolute number of DN subsets in thymus. D). Percentage of CD3+DP cells that develop into CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ cells in thymus. E). Subpopulations of T cells in lymph nodes and spleen. F). Expression of CD3, TCRβ and CD5 on CD4+ or CD8+ cells in spleens. * p<0.001. The data are representative of more than three experiments in which 3 to 5 mice from each group were used.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Thymocyte apoptosis.
A). Tunel assay on thymus of wild type, Egr-2 cTg and Egr-2 cKO mice. B). Percentage of Annexin V+ and PI thymocytes in wild type, Egr-2 cTg and Egr-2cKO mice. The data are representative of three to five mice.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Development of NKT cells in thymus.
A). Thymocytes from wild type, Egr-2 cKO and Egr-2 cTg mice were stained with NK1.1 and TCRβ antibodies (top) or with TCRvβ and CD1 tetramer (bottom). B). Absolute numbers of NKT cells in thymus of Egr-2 cKO, Egr-2 cTg and wild type mice. C). Percentages of DP cells that develop into NKT cells in thymus of Egr-2 cKO, Egr-2 cTg and wild type mice. * p<0.001. The data are representative of more than two experiments in which 3 to 5 mice from each group were used.
Figure 5
Figure 5. B cell development.
A). Cells from bone marrow, lymph nodes and spleen of wild type, Egr-2 cKO and Egr-2 cTg mice were co-stained with anti-CD19 and anti-B220 (left) or anti-IgM and anti-B220 (right). B). Absolute number of B cell precursor subpopulations in bone marrow of wild type, Egr-2 cKO and Egr-2 cTg mice. Pre-pro-B cells defined as NK1.1B220+CD19CD43+, pro-B cells defined as NK1.1B220+CD19+CD43+, pre-B cells as NK1.1B220+CD43, immature B cells as NK1.1B220+IgM+ and mature B cells defined as NK1.1-B220highIgM+. C). Percentages of immature B cells that develop into mature B cells in bone marrow. * p<0.001. The data are representative of more than two experiments in which 3 to 5 mice from each group were used.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Kinetic expression of Egr in wild type and expression of regulatory genes in thymocytes and bone marrow B cell precursors from Egr-2 cTg mice.
Egr expression as determined by quantitative RT-PCR in subpopulations of thymocytes (A) or bone marrow B cell precursors (B) of wild type mice. CD8+CD4CD3 ISP cells and CD4+CD8+ DP cells were sorted by FACS. DN cell subpopulations were isolated based on their expression of CD25 and CD44 after first gating on CD4CD8 cells. B cell subsets were sorted by FACS based on triple staining with CD19B220CD127+ for CLP cells, NK1.1B220+CD19CD43+ for pre-pro-B cells, NK1.1B220+CD19+CD43+ for pro-B cells and NK1.1B220+CD43 for pre-B cells. C). Expression of Notch1 and NUR77 genes in DN (CD4CD8) and ISP (CD8+CD3) thymocytes from wild type and Egr-2 cTg mice determined by quantitative RT-PCR. D). Expression of Pax5 in sub-populations of B cells from bone marrow of wild type and Egr-2 cTg mice. The relative expression is shown as mean ± s.e.m. for duplicate determinations, relative to actin. * p<0.001. The data are representative of more than two experiments in which 3 to 5 mice from each group were used.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothenberg EV, Moore JE, Yui MA. Launching the T-cell-lineage developmental programme. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;8:9–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. B cell development pathways. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:595–621. - PubMed
    1. Dias S, Xu W, McGregor S, Kee B. Transcriptional regulation of lymphocyte development. Curr Opinion in Genet & Development. 2008;18:441–448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carleton M, Haks MC, Smeele SA, Jones A, Belkowski SM, et al. Early growth response transcription factors are required for development of CD4−CD8− thymocytes to the CD4+CD8+ stage. J Immunol. 2002;168:1649–1658. - PubMed
    1. Shao H, Kono DH, Chen LY, Rubin EM, Kaye J. Induction of the early growth response (Egr) family of transcription factors during thymic selection. J Exp Med. 1997;185:731–744. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types