[Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry]
- PMID: 21533609
- DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2370-5
[Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry]
Abstract
Reliable measurements of the intraocular pressure (IOP) are necessary for glaucoma patients. The measuring procedure, anatomical changes of the eye or extraocular influences can lead to errors during applanation tonometry. The IOP is overestimated if measured through the wrong eyepiece of the slit lamp, if a force is interfering with the tonometer arm during the measurement, if the lid comes into contact with the tonometer tip, if blepharospasm occurs, if there is lid retraction or if a Valsalva maneuver is present. An underestimation of the IOP occurs if staining with fluorescein is absent or insufficient, if the illumination is not bright enough, if a corneal stromal edema is present, after LASIK, during accommodation, during repeated measures within a few minutes or during systemic blood pressure drop. Discrepancies of the IOP in both directions can appear if the calibration of the tonometer is irregular, if abnormal central corneal thickness or astigmatism is present. For correct measurements calibrations are advised once or twice a year.
Similar articles
-
Influence of IOP measurement through the wrong eyepiece of the slit lamp on Goldmann applanation tonometry.Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;18(6):910-4. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800609. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18988161
-
Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;243(6):563-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-1037-1. Epub 2004 Dec 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15614540 Clinical Trial.
-
[Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Dec;40(10):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017. PMID: 29174296 French.
-
[Contemporary possibilities of intraocular pressure measurement].Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013 Oct;69(4):175-80. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013. PMID: 24437996 Review. Czech.
-
Pediatric intraocular pressure measurements: Tonometers, central corneal thickness, and anesthesia.Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov-Dec;64(6):810-825. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 24. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31132392 Review.
Cited by
-
[Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].Ophthalmologe. 2015 Sep;112(9):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3188-8. Ophthalmologe. 2015. PMID: 25501931 German.
-
[Ease of handling of first and second generation rebound tonometers].Ophthalmologe. 2016 Apr;113(4):314-20. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0153-0. Ophthalmologe. 2016. PMID: 26498448 German.
-
Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169438. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28068365 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein.Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 29;12:2183-2188. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S177870. eCollection 2018. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30464378 Free PMC article.
-
Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2517-2521. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01098-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Int Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30968328
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical