Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;14(1-4):3-39.
doi: 10.1080/10937404.2011.556045.

Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma

B W Case  1 , J L Abraham, G Meeker, F D Pooley, K E Pinkerton
Affiliations
Review

Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma

B W Case et al. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011.

Abstract

Although asbestos research has been ongoing for decades, this increased knowledge has not led to consensus in many areas of the field. Two such areas of controversy include the specific definitions of asbestos, and limitations in understanding exposure-response relationships for various asbestos types and exposure levels and disease. This document reviews the current regulatory and mineralogical definitions and how variability in these definitions has led to difficulties in the discussion and comparison of both experimental laboratory and human epidemiological studies for asbestos. This review also examines the issues of exposure measurement in both animal and human studies, and discusses the impact of these issues on determination of cause for asbestos-related diseases. Limitations include the lack of detailed characterization and limited quantification of the fibers in most studies. Associated data gaps and research needs are also enumerated in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abraham J. L. Analysis of fibrous and non-fibrous particles. In: Rom W., editor. Environmental and occupational medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. pp. 275–295.
    1. Abraham J. L. Asbestos fiber risk assessment: Demonstration of the fallacy of assuming constant dose-risk relationship with changing fiber measurement methods. 2009. http://www.upstate.edu/pathenvi/art/case8/fibermeasurement.pdf, accessed December 6, 2009.
    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Report on the Expert Panel on Health Effects of Asbestos and Synthetic Vitreous Fibers: The influence of fiber length. 2003. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/asbestospanel/asbestostoc.html, accessed March 13, 2011.
    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Report on the Expert Panel on Biomarkers of Asbestos Exposure and Disease. Eastern Research Group; 2006. September 19. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/asbestos/biomarkers_asbestos/docs/Biom..., accessed August 9, 2010.
    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Evaluation of community-wide asbestos exposures. California: El Dorado Hills naturally occurring asbestos site, El Dorado Hills Boulevard, El Dorado Hills; 2010. Health consultation: Public comment version. Version for public comment, March 29. http://rescue.k12.ca.usnews/pdf/ElDoradoHillsPublicHealth%20Consultation..., accessed March 13, 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms